Transfusion Medicine Services, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Transfusion. 2011 May;51(5):943-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02931.x. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
Hospital transfusion laboratories collect information regarding blood transfusion and some registries gather clinical outcomes data without transfusion information, providing an opportunity to integrate these two sources to explore effects of transfusion on clinical outcomes. However, the use of laboratory information system (LIS) data for this purpose has not been validated previously.
Validation of LIS data against individual patient records was undertaken at two major centers. Data regarding all transfusion episodes were analyzed over seven 24-hour periods.
Data regarding 596 units were captured including 399 red blood cell (RBC), 95 platelet (PLT), 72 plasma, and 30 cryoprecipitate units. They were issued to: inpatient 221 (37.1%), intensive care 109 (18.3%), outpatient 95 (15.9%), operating theater 45 (7.6%), emergency department 27 (4.5%), and unrecorded 99 (16.6%). All products recorded by LIS as issued were documented as transfused to intended patients. Median time from issue to transfusion initiation could be calculated for 535 (89.8%) components: RBCs 16 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-18 min; interquartile range [IQR], 7-30 min), PLTs 20 minutes (95% CI, 15-22 min; IQR, 10-37 min), fresh-frozen plasma 33 minutes (95% CI, 14-83 min; IQR, 11-134 min), and cryoprecipitate 3 minutes (95% CI, -10 to 42 min; IQR, -15 to 116 min).
Across a range of blood component types and destinations comparison of LIS data with clinical records demonstrated concordance. The difference between LIS timing data and patient clinical records reflects expected time to transport, check, and prepare transfusion but does not affect the validity of linkage for most research purposes. Linkage of clinical registries with LIS data can therefore provide robust information regarding individual patient transfusion. This enables analysis of joint data sets to determine the impact of transfusion on clinical outcomes.
医院输血实验室收集输血相关信息,一些登记处收集临床结果数据而不包括输血信息,这为整合这两个来源以探索输血对临床结果的影响提供了机会。然而,此前尚未对这种使用实验室信息系统(LIS)数据的方法进行验证。
在两个主要中心进行了 LIS 数据与患者病历的验证。对七个 24 小时周期内的所有输血事件数据进行了分析。
共采集了 596 个单位的数据,包括 399 个红细胞(RBC)、95 个血小板(PLT)、72 个血浆和 30 个冷沉淀单位。这些单位被分配到:住院患者 221 个(37.1%)、重症监护 109 个(18.3%)、门诊患者 95 个(15.9%)、手术室 45 个(7.6%)、急诊 27 个(4.5%)和未记录的 99 个(16.6%)。LIS 记录的所有已发出的产品都被记录为输注给了预期的患者。可以计算出 535 个(89.8%)成分从发出到开始输血的中位时间:RBC 为 16 分钟(95%置信区间[CI],15-18 分钟;四分位距[IQR],7-30 分钟)、PLT 为 20 分钟(95%CI,15-22 分钟;IQR,10-37 分钟)、新鲜冰冻血浆为 33 分钟(95%CI,14-83 分钟;IQR,11-134 分钟)和冷沉淀为 3 分钟(95%CI,-10 到 42 分钟;IQR,-15 到 116 分钟)。
在一系列血液成分类型和目的地中,LIS 数据与临床记录的比较显示出一致性。LIS 时间数据与患者临床记录之间的差异反映了运输、检查和准备输血的预期时间,但不会影响大多数研究目的的链接有效性。因此,临床登记处与 LIS 数据的链接可以提供有关患者个体输血的可靠信息。这使我们能够分析联合数据集,以确定输血对临床结果的影响。