Suppr超能文献

食品和药品管理局报告偏差的知识。

Knowledge of food and drug administration reportable deviations.

机构信息

Scottsdale Healthcare, Thompson Peak Hospital, Laboratory Department, Blood Bank Division, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2011 Jul;51(7 Pt 2):1619-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03223.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As early as 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required blood centers and hospital transfusion services to report events associated with testing, storage, or distribution of blood products that deviated from current good manufacturing practices or affected the safety, purity, or potency of the product. Between 2004 and 2009, an average of only 8.6% of hospitals reported blood product deviations.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Case scenarios designed to evaluate knowledge of FDA reportable deviations were developed and sent for evaluation to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) and FDA division directors for FDA reportable deviations. A final survey containing eight cases was launched in a web-based online survey tool and sent to blood bank medical technologists. Additional information was queried regarding job title/responsibilities and the size of the blood center and/or transfusion service.

RESULTS

There were 176 respondents to the survey. Only 5.7% (10/176) answered all questions correctly. Analysis by job title and place of employment revealed no correlation to the number of correct responses. More importance was attached to deviations involving quality control, blood bank identification, unit specifications, and antibody identification. Less importance was attached to deviations involving phlebotomist's initials, failure to issue units in the computer, and using a recent sample from a previous hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that blood bankers did not have clear understanding of what constituted an FDA reportable occurrence. Size or type of blood establishment or individual job title was not associated with more knowledge of FDA reportable deviations.

摘要

背景

早在 2001 年,食品和药物管理局(FDA)就要求血液中心和医院输血服务机构报告与血液产品的测试、储存或分发有关的事件,这些事件偏离了现行良好生产规范,或影响产品的安全性、纯度或效力。在 2004 年至 2009 年期间,平均只有 8.6%的医院报告了血液产品偏差。

研究设计和方法

设计了评估 FDA 报告偏差知识的案例情景,并将其发送给生物制品评估和研究中心(CBER)和 FDA 报告偏差部门主管进行评估。一个包含八个案例的最终调查在基于网络的在线调查工具中启动,并发送给血液库医学技师。还询问了有关职称/职责以及血液中心和/或输血服务规模的其他信息。

结果

共有 176 人对调查做出了回应。只有 5.7%(10/176)的人正确回答了所有问题。按职称和工作地点进行的分析表明,正确回答的数量与职称和工作地点没有相关性。对涉及质量控制、血库标识、单位规格和抗体标识的偏差给予了更多的重视。对涉及采血员的初始标识、未能在计算机中发放单位以及使用上次住院的最近样本的偏差给予了较少的重视。

结论

本研究表明,血液银行家对构成 FDA 报告事件的内容没有明确的认识。血液机构的规模或类型或个人职称与对 FDA 报告偏差的更多了解无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验