Laboratório de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, USP, 14040-903 - Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;25(6):670-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2010.00894.x. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
This study compared the antipyretic effects of ibuprofen and indomethacin regarding the efficacy in blocking fevers induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS from E. coli) or pyrogenic mediators that act on prostaglandin (PG)-dependent and PG-independent pathways. The content of PGE₂ in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the dependence on central arginine vasopressin (AVP) release by both antipyretics were also compared during the reduction of LPS-induced fever. Finally, we investigated the effect of ibuprofen on hypothalamic cytokine content during LPS-induced fever. Ibuprofen (intraperitoneally, i.p.) dose-dependently inhibited the fever induced by LPS (intravenously, i.v.). Indomethacin (2 mg/kg) and ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) reduced the fever induced by i.c.v. injection of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, or arachidonic acid (AA). Ibuprofen, but not indomethacin, inhibited i.c.v. endothelin-1- and pre-formed pyrogenic factor (PFPF)-induced fever. Neither ibuprofen nor indomethacin affected fever by PGE₂ , PGF(2α) , or corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF); however, both reduced the CSF PGE₂ content after LPS. Bilateral injection of the AVP V(1) receptor antagonist d(CH2)₅ Tyr(Me)AVP into the ventral septal area blocked both ibuprofen- and indomethacin-induced antipyresis. Ibuprofen did not modify the hypothalamic increase in either IL-1β or IL-6 induced by LPS. In conclusion, although the antipyretic effect of ibuprofen involves the blockage of central production of PGE₂ and the endogenous release of AVP, differently from low dose of indomethacin, ibuprofen not only reduced the fever induced by PGE₂ -dependent, but also, that induced by PGE₂ -independent endogenous pyrogens. Moreover, ibuprofen does not affect the hypothalamic synthesis/release of IL-1β and IL-6.
这项研究比较了布洛芬和吲哚美辛在阻断脂多糖(大肠杆菌 LPS)或发热介质引起的发热方面的退热效果,这些发热介质作用于前列腺素(PG)依赖和非依赖途径。在降低 LPS 诱导的发热过程中,还比较了两种解热药对脑脊液(CSF)中 PGE₂含量的影响以及对中枢精氨酸血管加压素(AVP)释放的依赖性。最后,我们研究了布洛芬在 LPS 诱导发热期间对下丘脑细胞因子含量的影响。布洛芬(腹腔内,i.p.)剂量依赖性地抑制 LPS(静脉内,i.v.)诱导的发热。吲哚美辛(2mg/kg)和布洛芬(10mg/kg)降低了脑室注射白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α或花生四烯酸(AA)引起的发热。布洛芬但不是吲哚美辛抑制了脑室注射内皮素-1 和预先形成的发热因子(PFPF)引起的发热。布洛芬和吲哚美辛均不影响 PGE₂、PGF(2α)或促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)引起的发热;然而,两者均降低了 LPS 后 CSF 中的 PGE₂含量。双侧脑室注射 AVP V(1)受体拮抗剂 d(CH2)₅ Tyr(Me)AVP 阻断了布洛芬和吲哚美辛引起的解热作用。布洛芬不改变 LPS 诱导的下丘脑 IL-1β或 IL-6 的增加。总之,虽然布洛芬的退热作用涉及阻断中枢 PGE₂的产生和内源性 AVP 的释放,但与低剂量的吲哚美辛不同,布洛芬不仅降低了 PGE₂ 依赖的发热,而且还降低了 PGE₂ 非依赖的内源性发热原引起的发热。此外,布洛芬不影响下丘脑 IL-1β和 IL-6 的合成/释放。