Suppr超能文献

超声引导下关节内注射治疗炎性关节炎的成本效果随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intraarticular injection of inflammatory arthritis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, MSC10-5550 5th FL ACC, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;38(2):252-63. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100866. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We studied whether sonographic needle guidance affected the outcomes of intraarticular (IA) injection for inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

Joints with inflammatory arthritis (n = 244; 76% rheumatoid arthritis, 3% small joints, 51% intermediate, and 46% large) were randomized to injection by conventional palpation-guided anatomic injection (120 joints) or sonographic image-guided injection enhanced with a 1-handed reciprocating procedure device mechanical syringe (124 joints). A 1-needle, 2-syringe technique was used. After IA placement and synovial space dilation were confirmed by sonography, a syringe exchange was performed, and triamcinolone acetonide was injected with the second syringe through the indwelling IA needle. Baseline pain, procedural pain, pain at outcome (2 weeks and 6 months), responders, therapeutic duration, reinjection rates, total cost, and cost per responder were determined.

RESULTS

Relative to conventional palpation-guided methods, sonographic guidance for injection of inflammatory arthritis resulted in an 81% reduction in injection pain (p < 0.001), 35% reduction in pain scores at outcome (p < 0.02), 38% increase in the responder rate (p < 0.003), 34% reduction in the non-responder rate (p < 0.003), 32% increase in therapeutic duration (p = 0.01), 8% reduction ($7) in cost/patient/year, and a 33% ($64) reduction in cost/responder/year for a hospital outpatient (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sonographic needle guidance improves the performance, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of IA injections for inflammatory arthritis. (Clinical Trial Identifier NCT00651625).

摘要

目的

我们研究了超声引导下的关节内(IA)注射是否会影响炎性关节炎的治疗效果。

方法

将患有炎性关节炎的关节(n=244;76%为类风湿关节炎,3%为小关节,51%为中等关节,46%为大关节)随机分为两组:经传统触诊引导下的解剖注射(120 个关节)或超声图像引导下注射,同时使用单手往复操作装置的机械注射器进行增强(124 个关节)。采用 1 针 2 注射器技术。IA 位置确定并通过超声确认关节滑膜腔扩张后,进行注射器更换,通过留置的 IA 针,用第二注射器注入曲安奈德。测定基线疼痛、操作过程疼痛、结局时疼痛(2 周和 6 个月)、应答者、治疗持续时间、再次注射率、总费用和每应答者的成本。

结果

与传统触诊引导方法相比,超声引导炎性关节炎注射可使注射疼痛降低 81%(p<0.001),结局时疼痛评分降低 35%(p<0.02),应答率提高 38%(p<0.003),无应答率降低 34%(p<0.003),治疗持续时间延长 32%(p=0.01),每位患者/年的成本降低 8%($7),医院门诊每位应答者/年的成本降低 33%($64)(p<0.001)。

结论

超声引导下的针头引导提高了 IA 注射治疗炎性关节炎的性能、临床效果和成本效益。(临床试验标识符 NCT00651625)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验