Tantry Udaya S, Bliden Kevin P, Wei Cheryl, Storey Robert F, Armstrong Martin, Butler Kathleen, Gurbel Paul A
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, 2401 W Belvedere Ave., Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):556-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958561. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
The influence of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype on platelet function in patients treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel is unknown.
CYP2C19 (*1, *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *17) genotyping was performed in patients with coronary artery disease treated with ticagrelor (180-mg load, 90 mg BID) (n=92) or clopidogrel (600-mg load, 75 mg/d) (n=82). All patients received 75 to 100 mg/d aspirin. Platelet function was measured by aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation assay at predose, 8 hours postloading, and maintenance. In each treatment group, patients were categorized according to 2C19 genotype carrier status (loss-of-function, gain-of-function) and metabolizer status. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare platelet function among these categories for each treatment, and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare platelet function between the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups for each category. There was no statistically significant influence of genotype on platelet function during aspirin therapy alone. Ticagrelor exhibited lower platelet reactivity than clopidogrel by all assays irrespective of 2C19 genotype or metabolizer status (P<0.01). Loss-of-function carriers had greater platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy. The influence of genotype on platelet reactivity was greatest during clopidogrel maintenance and best demonstrated by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.
This report is the first to demonstrate the superior pharmacodynamic effect of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype. Whereas CYP2C19 genotype influenced the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, there was no effect of CYP2C19 genotype during ticagrelor therapy.
在接受替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗的患者中,细胞色素P450(CYP)2C19基因型对血小板功能的影响尚不清楚。
对接受替格瑞洛(负荷剂量180 mg,每日两次90 mg)(n = 92)或氯吡格雷(负荷剂量600 mg,每日75 mg)(n = 82)治疗的冠心病患者进行CYP2C19(*1、*2、*3、*4、*5、*6、*7、*8、*17)基因分型。所有患者均接受每日75至100 mg阿司匹林治疗。在给药前、负荷给药后8小时和维持治疗阶段,通过血小板聚集试验、VerifyNow P2Y12分析和血管舒张剂刺激的磷蛋白磷酸化试验来测量血小板功能。在每个治疗组中,患者根据2C19基因型携带者状态(功能丧失、功能获得)和代谢状态进行分类。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较各治疗组中这些类别之间的血小板功能,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较各类别中氯吡格雷组和替格瑞洛组之间的血小板功能。在单独使用阿司匹林治疗期间,基因型对血小板功能无统计学显著影响。无论2C19基因型或代谢状态如何,通过所有检测方法,替格瑞洛均比氯吡格雷表现出更低的血小板反应性(P<0.01)。在氯吡格雷治疗期间,功能丧失携带者具有更高的血小板反应性。在氯吡格雷维持治疗期间,基因型对血小板反应性的影响最大,VerifyNow P2Y12分析最能体现这一点。
本报告首次证明,无论CYP2C19基因型如何,替格瑞洛的药效学作用均优于氯吡格雷。虽然CYP2C19基因型影响氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用,但在替格瑞洛治疗期间,CYP2C19基因型无影响。