Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 16;153(10):633-40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00005.
Picking up prescriptions is an essential but previously unstudied component of adherence for patients who use retail pharmacies. Understanding the epidemiology and correlates of prescription abandonment may have an important effect on health care quality.
To evaluate the rates and correlates of prescription abandonment.
Cross-sectional cohort study.
One large retail pharmacy chain and one large pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) in the United States.
Prescriptions bottled at the retail pharmacy chain between 1 July 2008 and 30 September 2008 by patients insured by the PBM were identified. Pharmacy data were used to identify medications that were bottled and either dispensed or returned to stock (RTS) or abandoned. Data from the PBM were used to identify previous or subsequent dispensing at any pharmacy. The first (index) prescription in a class for each patient was assigned to 1 of 3 mutually exclusive outcomes: filled, RTS, or RTS with fill (in the 30 days after abandonment, the patient purchased a prescription for a medication in the same medication class at any pharmacy). Outcome rates were assessed by drug class, and generalized estimating equations were used to assess patient, neighborhood, insurance, and prescription characteristics associated with abandonment.
10 349 139 index prescriptions were filled by 5 249 380 patients. Overall, 3.27% of index prescriptions were abandoned; 1.77% were RTS and 1.50% were RTS with fill. Patients were least likely to abandon opiate prescriptions. Prescriptions with copayments of $40 to $50 and prescriptions costing more than $50 were 3.40 times and 4.68 times more likely, respectively, to be abandoned than prescriptions with no copayment (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). New users of medications had a 2.74 times greater probability of abandonment than prevalent users (P < 0.001), and prescriptions delivered electronically were 1.64 times more likely to be abandoned than those that were not electronic (P < 0.001).
The study included mainly insured patients and analyzed data collected during the summer months only.
Although prescription abandonment represents a small component of medication nonadherence, the correlates to abandonment highlight important opportunities to intervene and thereby improve medication taking.
CVS Caremark.
对于使用零售药店的患者来说,取药是依从性的一个重要但以前尚未研究过的组成部分。了解处方丢弃的流行病学和相关因素可能对医疗质量产生重要影响。
评估处方丢弃的发生率和相关因素。
横断面队列研究。
美国的一家大型零售连锁药店和一家大型药房福利管理公司(PBM)。
确定 2008 年 7 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日期间由 PBM 承保的患者在零售连锁药店配药的处方。利用药房数据识别已配药但已配药或退回库存(RTS)或丢弃的药物。利用 PBM 的数据来识别任何药房的先前或随后的配药。每位患者的每个药物类别的第一个(索引)处方被分配到 3 个互斥结果之一:配药、RTS 或 RTS 配药(在丢弃后的 30 天内,患者在任何药房购买了相同药物类别的处方)。通过药物类别评估结果发生率,并使用广义估计方程评估与丢弃相关的患者、社区、保险和处方特征。
共有 10349139 个索引处方由 5249380 名患者配药。总体而言,3.27%的索引处方被丢弃;1.77%为 RTS,1.50%为 RTS 配药。阿片类药物处方的丢弃率最低。自付额为 40 至 50 美元和超过 50 美元的处方被丢弃的可能性分别是无自付额处方的 3.40 倍和 4.68 倍(两者均 P<0.001)。新用药患者的丢弃可能性比现用药患者高 2.74 倍(P<0.001),电子配药处方比非电子配药处方更有可能被丢弃,丢弃的可能性高 1.64 倍(P<0.001)。
该研究主要包括有保险的患者,并且仅分析了夏季收集的数据。
尽管处方丢弃仅占药物不依从的一小部分,但与丢弃相关的因素突出了进行干预的重要机会,从而改善了用药依从性。
CVS Caremark。