Bausone-Gazda Dawn, Lefaiver Cheryl A, Walters Shelley-Ann
Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453, USA.
J Infus Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(6):371-84. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3181f85be2.
An open-label, prospective, randomized, noninferiority study was conducted at a large academic, Magnet-designated, Level I trauma center to compare the peripheral intravenous catheter securement-related complication rates of 2 different stabilization systems. The control stabilization system included the StatLock device with a nonwinged catheter, and the investigational stabilization system included a closed catheter system with a specially designed Tegaderm dressing. Data from 302 subjects indicated that the investigational stabilization system was noninferior or similar to the control stabilization system with respect to the overall securement-related complications. The cost of the investigational stabilization system was approximately 75% of the cost for the control stabilization system.
在一家大型学术性、获得磁体认证的一级创伤中心进行了一项开放标签、前瞻性、随机、非劣效性研究，以比较两种不同固定系统的外周静脉导管固定相关并发症发生率。对照固定系统包括带有无翼导管的StatLock装置，研究固定系统包括带有专门设计的泰德 Derm 敷料的封闭式导管系统。来自302名受试者的数据表明，在总体固定相关并发症方面，研究固定系统不劣于或类似于对照固定系统。研究固定系统的成本约为对照固定系统成本的75%。
