Groll Dianne, Davies Barbara, Mac Donald Joan, Nelson Susanne, Virani Tazim
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Infus Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(6):385-90. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3181f85a73.
To prevent complications from peripheral vascular access device (PVAD) therapy, the Infusion Nurses Society (INS) developed 2 scales to measure the extent and severity of phlebitis and infiltration in PVADs. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of these scales to validate them with respect to their interrater reliability, concurrent validity, feasibility, and acceptability. A total of 182 patients at 2 sites were enrolled, and 416 observations of PVAD sites were made. Two nurses independently rated each PVAD site for the presence or absence of phlebitis and/or infiltration by using the INS scales. The interrater reliability was calculated, as was the agreement of the observed versus charted incidence of phlebitis and infiltration (concurrent validity) and the ease of use of the scales (feasibility, acceptability). Interrater reliability for both the Phlebitis and Infiltration scales and concurrent validity were found to be statistically significant (P < .05). The study nurses reported the scales to be easy to use, taking an average of 1.3 minutes to complete both. The importance of valid measures for use in research cannot be underestimated. The INS Phlebitis and Infiltration scales have been shown to be easy to use, valid, and reliable scales.
为预防外周血管通路装置(PVAD)治疗引发的并发症,输液护理学会(INS)制定了2个量表,用于衡量PVAD中静脉炎和渗漏的程度及严重程度。本研究评估了这些量表的心理测量特性,以验证其在评分者间信度、同时效度、可行性和可接受性方面的情况。在2个地点共纳入了182例患者,并对PVAD部位进行了416次观察。两名护士使用INS量表分别独立对每个PVAD部位的静脉炎和/或渗漏情况进行评分。计算了评分者间信度,以及观察到的静脉炎和渗漏发生率与记录的发生率之间的一致性(同时效度)和量表的易用性(可行性、可接受性)。发现静脉炎量表和渗漏量表的评分者间信度及同时效度均具有统计学意义(P <.05)。参与研究的护士报告称这些量表易于使用,完成两个量表平均用时1.3分钟。用于研究的有效测量方法的重要性不可低估。INS静脉炎量表和渗漏量表已被证明是易于使用、有效且可靠的量表。