• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌行乳房切除术时切除范围不足:哪些患者有风险?

Inadequate margins of excision when undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer: which patients are at risk?

机构信息

Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(4):952-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1406-4. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-010-1406-4
PMID:21080087
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the margin status and risk factors for inadequate margins among patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM) and traditional total mastectomies (TM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing mastectomies from 2003 to 2009 were included. Margins of excision were considered positive if carcinoma was at an inked margin and were considered close if such disease was within 2 mm of an inked margin.

RESULTS

A total of 426 patients were identified. The mean age was 60 years and 90% were white. Mean tumor size was 2.6 cm and 44% had multiple ipsilateral carcinomas. Of 426 patients, 177 (42%) underwent SSM with reconstruction and 249 (58%) TM. The rate of positive or close margins on the initial specimen was 29% for SSM vs. 12% for TM (P < 0.01), and the rate of reoperation for margins was 7% for SSM vs. 2% for TM (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that independent risk factors for initial close or positive margins included SSM (odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.05-5.30), multiple ipsilateral tumors (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05-4.24), and upper-inner quadrant location (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.07-6.19). Mean follow-up time was 28 months, and the local recurrence rate was 0.9%. Local recurrence rates were not different for those undergoing SSM (1.1%) vs. TM (0.8%, P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy patients undergoing SSM, with multiple ipsilateral tumors, and/or upper-inner quadrant disease are at significantly higher risk for inadequate margins of excision. These patients warrant more vigilant intraoperative attention to margin status to ensure adequate margins at the end of the first operation.

摘要

背景

我们分析了行保乳乳房切除术(SSM)和传统全乳房切除术(TM)的患者中切缘阳性和切缘不足的情况及相关危险因素。

材料与方法

纳入 2003 年至 2009 年间行乳房切除术的患者。如果癌组织位于墨染切缘处,则认为切缘阳性,如果癌组织距离墨染切缘 2mm 以内,则认为切缘接近。

结果

共纳入 426 例患者。患者的平均年龄为 60 岁,90%为白人。肿瘤平均直径为 2.6cm,44%患者同侧有多个癌灶。426 例患者中,177 例行 SSM 加重建术(占 42%),249 例行 TM(占 58%)。SSM 组初始标本切缘阳性或切缘接近的比例为 29%,TM 组为 12%(P<0.01),SSM 组因切缘问题再次手术的比例为 7%,TM 组为 2%(P<0.01)。Logistic 回归分析显示,初始切缘阳性或切缘接近的独立危险因素包括 SSM(比值比 2.36,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.05-5.30)、同侧多个肿瘤(OR 2.12,95%CI 1.05-4.24)和肿瘤位于内上象限(OR 2.58,95%CI 1.07-6.19)。平均随访时间为 28 个月,局部复发率为 0.9%。行 SSM 组的局部复发率为 1.1%,TM 组为 0.8%(P=NS),两组无统计学差异。

结论

行 SSM 且同侧有多个肿瘤和/或肿瘤位于内上象限的乳房切除术患者,切缘不足的风险显著增加。这些患者在第一次手术时需要更密切关注切缘状态,以确保初次手术获得足够的切缘。

相似文献

1
Inadequate margins of excision when undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer: which patients are at risk?乳腺癌行乳房切除术时切除范围不足:哪些患者有风险?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(4):952-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1406-4. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
2
Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease.保乳头乳晕的乳房切除术适用于晚期疾病。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3294-302. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3174-4. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
3
Oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer.保乳手术后即刻重建治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的肿瘤安全性。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;102(1):39-42. doi: 10.1002/jso.21573.
4
Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence.保留皮肤的乳房切除术联合即刻乳房重建:局部复发的批判性分析
Cancer J. 2000 Sep-Oct;6(5):331-5.
5
Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction.保留乳头或全部皮肤的乳房切除术即刻重建的肿瘤安全性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Apr;212(4):686-93; discussion 693-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.039.
6
[Therapeutic procedure in recurrence after limited surgery for breast cancer].[乳腺癌有限手术后复发的治疗方法]
Chirurg. 1992 Jun;63(6):483-90.
7
The use of skin sparing mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer: The Emory experience.保留皮肤的乳房切除术在乳腺癌治疗中的应用:埃默里大学的经验。
Surg Oncol. 2003 Dec;12(4):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2003.09.002.
8
Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.切缘阴性状态可改善接受保守治疗的乳腺癌患者的局部控制情况。
Cancer J Sci Am. 2000 Jan-Feb;6(1):28-33.
9
Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.接受乳腺癌保乳手术的女性术中手术切缘状态大体检查的准确性。
Am Surg. 2005 Jan;71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8.
10
[Manifestation, therapy and follow-up of locoregional breast carcinoma recurrence].[局部区域乳腺癌复发的表现、治疗及随访]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1996;113:108-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing risks of surgical complications and positive margins for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and elevated BMI: An institutional cohort study.平衡乳腺浸润性小叶癌且BMI升高患者的手术并发症风险与切缘阳性情况:一项机构队列研究。
Am J Surg. 2025 Mar;241:116073. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116073. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
ASO Author Reflections: Can Adequate Surgical Margin Rates after Mastectomy Be Improved?ASO作者反思:乳房切除术后足够的手术切缘率能否提高?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8900-8901. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16312-7. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
3
Identifying Factors Predicting Margin Status After Mastectomy.
确定乳房切除术切缘状态的预测因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8882-8890. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16221-9. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
Comparison of locoregional recurrence risk among nipple-sparing mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center study.保乳手术、乳腺切除术和单纯乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌患者的局部区域复发风险比较:一项单中心研究。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1010-1017. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01613-2. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients with Local Recurrence After Mastectomy Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study of 4153 Cases.乳腺癌改良根治术后局部复发患者即刻乳房重建的长期疗效:一项 4153 例回顾性多中心研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6532-6540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13832-6. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Pattern of local recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review.乳腺癌患者乳房切除术后局部复发及重建模式:一项系统评价
Gland Surg. 2021 Jun;10(6):2037-2046. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-15.
7
Postoperative radiotherapy after nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy: a review of recent institutional and pooled data.乳头保留或皮肤保留乳房切除术后的术后放疗:近期机构数据和汇总数据综述
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 May 11;12:834. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.834. eCollection 2018.
8
Long-term outcomes of patients with breast cancer after nipple-sparing mastectomy/skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction: Comparison with conventional mastectomy in a single center study.保留乳头乳房切除术/保留皮肤乳房切除术后即刻行腹直肌肌皮瓣重建的乳腺癌患者的长期预后:单中心研究中与传统乳房切除术的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(18):e0680. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010680.
9
Comparison of Local Recurrence After Simple and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Performed in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.导管原位癌患者行单纯乳房切除术与保乳乳房切除术后局部复发情况的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;24(4):1071-1076. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5673-6. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature.保留皮肤和保留乳头的乳房切除术的肿瘤学安全性:文献讨论与综述
Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:921821. doi: 10.1155/2012/921821. Epub 2012 Jul 17.