• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 ASHA 学术期刊发表研究相关的伦理原则:涵盖的重要性和充分性。

Ethical principles associated with the publication of research in ASHA's scholarly journals: importance and adequacy of coverage.

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S394-416. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0260). Epub 2010 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0260)
PMID:21081676
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 2-part study was to determine the importance of specific topics relating to publication ethics and adequacy of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's (ASHA's) policies regarding these topics.

METHOD

A 56-item Web-based survey was sent to (a) ASHA journal editors, associate editors, and members of the Publications Board (Group 1); (b) authors, reviewers, and members of ASHA's Board of Ethics (Group 2); and (c) a random sample of the ASHA membership, characterized as journal readers (Group 3). The survey contained 4 questions related to ethical principles associated with the publication of research: (a) In regard to scientific integrity in research publications in general, how important is the issue of [topic]? (b) Should ASHA publication policies address this issue? (c) Do ASHA policies address this issue? (d) If yes, how adequately do ASHA policies address this issue? A second study evaluated the contents of ASHA's publication policy documents in regard to their coverage of the survey topics.

RESULTS

Results indicated many of the topics deemed most important by all groups were included in ASHA's publication policy documents; other topics, although included, were not adequately addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

ASHA needs a single, unifying publication policy document, and increased education of all groups in the realm of ethics in the publication process is indicated.

摘要

目的

本研究分为两部分,旨在确定与出版道德相关的特定主题的重要性,以及美国言语-语言-听力协会(ASHA)关于这些主题的政策的充分性。

方法

一项 56 项的基于网络的调查分发给(a)ASHA 期刊编辑、副编辑和出版委员会成员(第 1 组);(b)作者、审稿人和 ASHA 道德委员会成员(第 2 组);以及(c)ASHA 会员中的随机样本,特征为期刊读者(第 3 组)。该调查包含与研究发表相关的四项道德原则问题:(a)关于一般研究出版物中的科学诚信,[主题]问题有多重要?(b)ASHA 的出版政策是否应解决此问题?(c)ASHA 政策是否解决了这个问题?(d)如果是,ASHA 政策如何充分解决这个问题?第二项研究评估了 ASHA 出版政策文件中关于调查主题的内容。

结果

结果表明,所有组都认为最重要的许多主题都包含在 ASHA 的出版政策文件中;其他主题虽然包含在内,但没有得到充分解决。

结论

ASHA 需要一个单一的、统一的出版政策文件,并且表明需要对所有群体进行出版过程中伦理道德方面的教育。

相似文献

1
Ethical principles associated with the publication of research in ASHA's scholarly journals: importance and adequacy of coverage.与 ASHA 学术期刊发表研究相关的伦理原则:涵盖的重要性和充分性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S394-416. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0260). Epub 2010 Nov 16.
2
Research integrity in communication sciences and disorders: preface.研究诚信在沟通科学与障碍领域:前言。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S300-2. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/09-0266).
3
A statement on ethics from the HEART group.心脏研究小组关于伦理的声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 May 1;71(6):859-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21555.
4
Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.促进研究成果发表中的道德行为。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x.
5
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.科学期刊编辑对出版伦理的看法:一项国际调查结果
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):348-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
6
A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.心脏研究小组关于伦理的声明。
Circ Res. 2008 May 9;102(9):e104-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.174243.
7
Journal publication ethics 201: culture in crisis?《期刊出版伦理201:文化处于危机之中?》
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):553. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4352.
8
Standards for ethical publication.伦理出版标准。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.11.002.
9
The examination of peer review and publication in neurology.神经病学领域同行评审与发表情况的审视。
J Child Neurol. 2010 Oct;25(10):1298-301. doi: 10.1177/0883073810374647. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
10
[Ethics in articles published in medical journals].[医学期刊发表文章中的伦理问题]
Rev Med Chil. 2007 Apr;135(4):529-33. Epub 2007 May 16.