Suppr超能文献

与 ASHA 学术期刊发表研究相关的伦理原则:涵盖的重要性和充分性。

Ethical principles associated with the publication of research in ASHA's scholarly journals: importance and adequacy of coverage.

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S394-416. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0260). Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this 2-part study was to determine the importance of specific topics relating to publication ethics and adequacy of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's (ASHA's) policies regarding these topics.

METHOD

A 56-item Web-based survey was sent to (a) ASHA journal editors, associate editors, and members of the Publications Board (Group 1); (b) authors, reviewers, and members of ASHA's Board of Ethics (Group 2); and (c) a random sample of the ASHA membership, characterized as journal readers (Group 3). The survey contained 4 questions related to ethical principles associated with the publication of research: (a) In regard to scientific integrity in research publications in general, how important is the issue of [topic]? (b) Should ASHA publication policies address this issue? (c) Do ASHA policies address this issue? (d) If yes, how adequately do ASHA policies address this issue? A second study evaluated the contents of ASHA's publication policy documents in regard to their coverage of the survey topics.

RESULTS

Results indicated many of the topics deemed most important by all groups were included in ASHA's publication policy documents; other topics, although included, were not adequately addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

ASHA needs a single, unifying publication policy document, and increased education of all groups in the realm of ethics in the publication process is indicated.

摘要

目的

本研究分为两部分,旨在确定与出版道德相关的特定主题的重要性,以及美国言语-语言-听力协会(ASHA)关于这些主题的政策的充分性。

方法

一项 56 项的基于网络的调查分发给(a)ASHA 期刊编辑、副编辑和出版委员会成员(第 1 组);(b)作者、审稿人和 ASHA 道德委员会成员(第 2 组);以及(c)ASHA 会员中的随机样本,特征为期刊读者(第 3 组)。该调查包含与研究发表相关的四项道德原则问题:(a)关于一般研究出版物中的科学诚信,[主题]问题有多重要?(b)ASHA 的出版政策是否应解决此问题?(c)ASHA 政策是否解决了这个问题?(d)如果是,ASHA 政策如何充分解决这个问题?第二项研究评估了 ASHA 出版政策文件中关于调查主题的内容。

结果

结果表明,所有组都认为最重要的许多主题都包含在 ASHA 的出版政策文件中;其他主题虽然包含在内,但没有得到充分解决。

结论

ASHA 需要一个单一的、统一的出版政策文件,并且表明需要对所有群体进行出版过程中伦理道德方面的教育。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验