Department of Psychology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA.
Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(4):375-82. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2010.524073.
Qualitatively oriented research (e.g., studies of suicide notes) has shed valuable light on the phenomenology of suicidal states. However, one draw back to this approach is that conclusions drawn from such data are inferential. In the current study, we took a more direct approach by having a sample of 52 suicidal inpatients provide written responses to the following query: Why suicide? A reliable coding system was developed that captured seven distinct response types to our prompt (i.e., suicide was seen as: the easy way out, a permanent solution, an escape from pain, the only option, self-oriented, related to hopelessness, and relationally-focused). In our discussion, we further reflect on these patient perceptions of suicide in terms of theory, research, and practice.
定性研究(例如,自杀遗言的研究)为自杀状态的现象学提供了宝贵的启示。然而,这种方法的一个缺点是,从这些数据中得出的结论是推论性的。在本研究中,我们通过让 52 名住院自杀患者对以下问题提供书面回答,采取了一种更直接的方法:为什么要自杀?我们开发了一个可靠的编码系统,该系统可以捕捉到我们提示的七种不同的反应类型(即,自杀被视为:一种简单的出路,一个永久的解决方案,一种逃避痛苦的方式,唯一的选择,自我导向,与绝望有关,以及以关系为中心)。在我们的讨论中,我们进一步从理论、研究和实践的角度来反思这些患者对自杀的看法。