Breadmore Michael C
Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, School of Chemistry, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Bioanalysis. 2009 Aug;1(5):889-94. doi: 10.4155/bio.09.73.
CE is a powerful liquid-phase separation technique that is an attractive alternative to HPLC because of its small sample requirements, high resolving power and excellent mass detection limits. While there are many similarities between the two techniques, there are also many differences, some obvious, some subtle. One of the often overlooked differences is the way sample is injected. In HPLC, injection is a very minor component of the method and the choice is predominantly restricted to the choice of solvent and the injection volume. But in CE, it is vastly more complex, and development of an appropriate injection strategy should be given consideration during any method development. While the choice between hydrodynamic or electrokinetic injection may not initially be given any thought, selection of the right approach for the right application can lead to significant improvements in performance, particularly with regard to achieving the lowest detection limits possible. The question is how to decide the best way to inject for each application?
毛细管电泳是一种强大的液相分离技术,由于其对样品需求量小、分辨能力高以及出色的质量检测限,它是高效液相色谱颇具吸引力的替代方法。虽然这两种技术有许多相似之处,但也存在许多差异,有些差异很明显,有些则很细微。其中一个经常被忽视的差异是样品的进样方式。在高效液相色谱中,进样是该方法中非常次要的部分,选择主要限于溶剂的选择和进样体积。但在毛细管电泳中,情况要复杂得多,在任何方法开发过程中都应考虑制定合适的进样策略。虽然最初可能不会考虑流体动力学进样或电动进样之间的选择,但为正确的应用选择正确的方法可以显著提高性能,特别是在实现尽可能低的检测限方面。问题是如何为每种应用确定最佳的进样方式?