Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, California 94704, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6):491-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.020.
Potentially effective environmental strategies have been recommended to reduce heavy alcohol use among college students. However, studies to date on environmental prevention strategies are few in number and have been limited by their nonexperimental designs, inadequate sample sizes, and lack of attention to settings where the majority of heavy drinking events occur.
To determine whether environmental prevention strategies targeting off-campus settings would reduce the likelihood and incidence of student intoxication at those settings.
The Safer California Universities study involved 14 large public universities, half of which were assigned randomly to the Safer intervention condition after baseline data collection in 2003. Environmental interventions took place in 2005 and 2006 after 1 year of planning with seven Safer intervention universities. Random cross-sectional samples of undergraduates completed online surveys in four consecutive fall semesters (2003-2006).
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Campuses and communities surrounding eight campuses of the University of California and six in the California State University system were utilized. The study used random samples of undergraduates (∼500-1000 per campus per year) attending the 14 public California universities.
Safer environmental interventions included nuisance party enforcement operations, minor decoy operations, driving-under-the-influence checkpoints, social host ordinances, and use of campus and local media to increase the visibility of environmental strategies.
Proportion of drinking occasions in which students drank to intoxication at six different settings during the fall semester (residence hall party, campus event, fraternity or sorority party, party at off-campus apartment or house, bar/restaurant, outdoor setting), any intoxication at each setting during the semester, and whether students drank to intoxication the last time they went to each setting.
Significant reductions in the incidence and likelihood of intoxication at off-campus parties and bars/restaurants were observed for Safer intervention universities compared to controls. A lower likelihood of intoxication was observed also for Safer intervention universities the last time students drank at an off-campus party (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.68, 0.97); a bar or restaurant (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.62, 0.94); or any setting (OR=0.80, 95% CI=0.65, 0.97). No increase in intoxication (e.g., displacement) appeared in other settings. Further, stronger intervention effects were achieved at Safer universities with the highest level of implementation.
Environmental prevention strategies targeting settings where the majority of heavy drinking events occur appear to be effective in reducing the incidence and likelihood of intoxication among college students.
已经推荐了一些潜在有效的环境策略,以减少大学生的大量饮酒行为。然而,迄今为止关于环境预防策略的研究数量较少,并且受到其非实验设计、样本量不足以及对大多数重度饮酒事件发生的环境的关注不足的限制。
确定针对校外环境的环境预防策略是否会降低学生在这些环境中醉酒的可能性和发生率。
加利福尼亚大学更安全研究涉及 14 所大型公立大学,其中一半在 2003 年基线数据收集后被随机分配到更安全的干预条件。环境干预于 2005 年和 2006 年进行,此前在加利福尼亚大学和加利福尼亚州立大学系统的八所大学校园及其周围的校园和社区进行了为期一年的规划。在四个连续的秋季学期(2003-2006 年)中,随机抽取本科生进行在线调查。
设置/参与者:使用加利福尼亚大学和加利福尼亚州立大学系统的 14 所公立加利福尼亚大学的校园和社区的随机样本。该研究使用了参加 14 所加利福尼亚公立大学的约 500-1000 名本科生的随机样本(每年每所大学约 500-1000 名本科生)。
更安全的环境干预措施包括妨害派对执法行动、未成年人诱饵行动、酒后驾车检查站、社交主办方条例以及利用校园和当地媒体提高环境策略的知名度。
秋季学期在六个不同环境中(宿舍派对、校园活动、兄弟会或姐妹会派对、校外公寓或房屋派对、酒吧/餐厅、户外环境)学生饮酒至醉酒的饮酒场合比例、学期内每个环境的任何醉酒情况,以及学生最后一次去每个环境时是否饮酒至醉酒。
与对照组相比,更安全的干预大学观察到校外派对和酒吧/餐厅醉酒发生率和可能性显著降低。还观察到学生在校外派对(OR=0.81,95%CI=0.68,0.97);酒吧或餐厅(OR=0.76,95%CI=0.62,0.94);或任何环境(OR=0.80,95%CI=0.65,0.97)的最后一次饮酒时醉酒的可能性降低。在其他环境中没有出现醉酒(例如,移位)增加的情况。此外,在实施水平最高的安全大学中,实现了更强的干预效果。
针对大多数重度饮酒事件发生的环境的环境预防策略似乎可以有效降低大学生醉酒的发生率和可能性。