National Institute of Crop Science, Tsukuba 305-8518, Japan.
Phytochemistry. 2011 Jul;72(10):1263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
Quantitative proteomics is one of the analytical approaches used to clarify crop responses to stress conditions. Recent remarkable advances in proteomics technologies allow for the identification of a wider range of proteins than was previously possible. Current proteomic methods fall into roughly two categories: gel-based quantification methods, including conventional two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis, and MS-based quantification methods consists of label-based and label-free protein quantification approaches. Although MS-based quantification methods have become mainstream in recent years, gel-based quantification methods are still useful for proteomic analyses. Previous studies examining crop responses to stress conditions reveal that each method has both advantages and disadvantages in regard to protein quantification in comparative proteomic analyses. Furthermore, one proteomics approach cannot be fully substituted by another technique. In this review, we discuss and highlight the basis and applications of quantitative proteomic analysis approaches in crop seedlings in response to flooding and osmotic stress as two environmental stresses.
定量蛋白质组学是用于阐明作物对胁迫条件响应的分析方法之一。最近蛋白质组学技术的显著进展使得能够鉴定比以前更多种类的蛋白质。当前的蛋白质组学方法大致分为两类:基于凝胶的定量方法,包括传统的二维凝胶电泳和二维荧光差异凝胶电泳,以及基于 MS 的定量方法,包括基于标记和无标记的蛋白质定量方法。尽管基于 MS 的定量方法近年来已成为主流,但基于凝胶的定量方法在蛋白质组学分析中仍然有用。先前研究作物对胁迫条件的响应表明,在比较蛋白质组学分析中,每种方法在蛋白质定量方面都有其优缺点。此外,一种蛋白质组学方法不能完全被另一种技术所取代。在这篇综述中,我们讨论并强调了定量蛋白质组学分析方法在作物幼苗应对水淹和渗透胁迫这两种环境胁迫中的基础和应用。