Boehmer Jamie L, DeGrasse Jeffrey A, McFarland Melinda A, Tall Elizabeth A, Shefcheck Kevin J, Ward Jeffrey L, Bannerman Douglas D
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Veterinary Medicine, 8401 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, MD 20708, United States.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010 Dec 15;138(4):252-66. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
Coliform mastitis remains a primary focus of dairy cattle disease research due in part to the lack of efficacious treatment options for the deleterious side effects of exposure to LPS, including profound intra-mammary inflammation. To facilitate new veterinary drug approvals, reliable biomarkers are needed to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive therapies for the treatment of inflammation associated with coliform mastitis. Most attempts to characterize the host response to LPS, however, have been accomplished using ELISAs. Because a relatively limited number of bovine-specific antibodies are commercially available, reliance on antibodies can be very limiting for biomarker discovery. Conversely, proteomic approaches boast the capability to analyze an unlimited number of protein targets in a single experiment, independent of antibody availability. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), a widely used proteomic strategy for the identification of proteins in complex mixtures, has gained popularity as a means to characterize proteins in various bovine milk fractions, both under normal physiological conditions as well as during clinical mastitis. The biological complexity of bovine milk has, however, precluded the complete annotation of the bovine milk proteome. Conventional approaches to reducing sample complexity, including fractionation and the removal of high abundance proteins, has improved proteome coverage, but the dynamic range of proteins present, and abundance of a relatively small number of proteins, continues to hinder comparative proteomic analyses of bovine milk. Nonetheless, advances in both liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry instrumentation, including nano-flow liquid chromatography (nano-LC), nano-spray ionization, and faster scanning speeds and ionization efficiency of mass spectrometers, have improved analyses of complex samples. In the current paper, we review the proteomic approaches used to conduct comparative analyses of milk from healthy cows and cows with clinical mastitis, as well as proteins related to the host response that have been identified in mastitic milk. Additionally, we present data that suggests the potential utility of LC-MS/MS label-free quantification as an alternative to costly labeling strategies for the relative quantification of individual proteins in complex mixtures. Temporal expression patterns generated using spectral counts, an LC-MS/MS label-free quantification strategy, corresponded well with ELISA data for acute phase proteins with commercially available antibodies. Combined, the capability to identify low abundance proteins, and the potential to generate temporal expression profiles, indicate the advantages of using proteomics as a screening tool in biomarker discovery analyses to assess biologically relevant proteins modulated during disease, including previously uncharacterized targets.
大肠埃希氏菌性乳腺炎仍然是奶牛疾病研究的主要焦点,部分原因是缺乏针对接触脂多糖(LPS)有害副作用的有效治疗方案,这些副作用包括严重的乳腺内炎症。为了促进新兽药的批准,需要可靠的生物标志物来评估辅助疗法治疗与大肠埃希氏菌性乳腺炎相关炎症的疗效。然而,大多数表征宿主对LPS反应的尝试都是使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)完成的。由于可商购获得的牛特异性抗体数量相对有限,依赖抗体对于生物标志物发现可能非常有限。相反,蛋白质组学方法具有在单个实验中分析无限数量蛋白质靶标的能力,而不受抗体可用性的限制。液相色谱-串联质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)是一种广泛用于鉴定复杂混合物中蛋白质的蛋白质组学策略,作为一种在正常生理条件以及临床乳腺炎期间表征各种牛乳组分中蛋白质的手段已受到广泛关注。然而,牛乳的生物学复杂性阻碍了牛乳蛋白质组的完整注释。降低样品复杂性的传统方法,包括分级分离和去除高丰度蛋白质,已提高了蛋白质组覆盖率,但存在的蛋白质动态范围以及相对少量蛋白质的丰度,继续阻碍牛乳的比较蛋白质组学分析。尽管如此,液相色谱和质谱仪器的进步,包括纳流液相色谱(nano-LC)、纳喷雾电离以及质谱仪更快的扫描速度和电离效率,都改进了对复杂样品的分析。在本文中,我们综述了用于对健康奶牛和临床乳腺炎奶牛的乳汁进行比较分析的蛋白质组学方法,以及在乳腺炎乳汁中鉴定出的与宿主反应相关的蛋白质。此外,我们展示的数据表明,LC-MS/MS无标记定量作为一种替代昂贵标记策略用于复杂混合物中单个蛋白质相对定量的潜在效用。使用光谱计数(一种LC-MS/MS无标记定量策略)生成的时间表达模式与具有可商购抗体的急性期蛋白的ELISA数据非常吻合。综合起来,鉴定低丰度蛋白质的能力以及生成时间表达谱的潜力,表明了使用蛋白质组学作为生物标志物发现分析中的筛选工具来评估疾病期间调节的生物学相关蛋白质(包括以前未表征的靶标)的优势。