• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作测试:评估护理专业本科生的团队合作和批判性思维行为。

Collaborative testing: assessing teamwork and critical thinking behaviors in baccalaureate nursing students.

机构信息

The University of Texas Medical Branch, School of Nursing, 15307 Tadworth Dr. Houston, TX 77062, United States.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Apr;31(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.027
PMID:21084136
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to foster teamwork and critical thinking behaviors in baccalaureate nursing students using a collaborative testing environment. Collaborative testing affords the nurse educator a unique opportunity to actively influence the development of critical thinking skills directly influencing the nursing student's ability to solve complex patient problems. Using a quasi-experimental approach exam scores from students in prior semesters were compared to students in several semesters using collaborative testing in one undergraduate course taught by the same faculty. In the experimental group collaborative testing was used in the two unit examinations, while the final examination remained individual. For collaborative testing the students were grouped by random assignment. They were not allowed the use of notes, textbooks, or other resource materials. Any student who wished to work alone was allowed do so and any student coming late (within 15 min of examination beginning) was required to work alone. Each student submitted individual examination answer forms, and groups were not required to reach consensus. Collaborative testing is one means to foster critical thinking by allowing students to solve complex patient problems within an examination environment. This better prepares them for national certification exams.

摘要

本研究旨在通过协作测试环境培养护理专业学生的团队合作和批判性思维行为。协作测试为护理教育者提供了一个独特的机会,可以积极影响批判性思维技能的发展,直接影响护理学生解决复杂患者问题的能力。采用准实验方法,比较了前几个学期学生的考试成绩和使用协作测试的几个学期的学生成绩,这些学生都在同一门本科课程中由同一位教师授课。在实验组中,协作测试用于两个单元考试,而期末考试仍然是个人考试。对于协作测试,学生通过随机分配分组。他们不允许使用笔记、教科书或其他资源材料。任何希望独自工作的学生都可以这样做,任何迟到的学生(考试开始后 15 分钟内)都必须独自工作。每个学生都提交个人考试答卷,并且小组不需要达成共识。协作测试是通过在考试环境中让学生解决复杂的患者问题来培养批判性思维的一种方法。这使他们为国家认证考试做好了更好的准备。

相似文献

1
Collaborative testing: assessing teamwork and critical thinking behaviors in baccalaureate nursing students.协作测试:评估护理专业本科生的团队合作和批判性思维行为。
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Apr;31(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.027. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
2
Collaborative testing as a learning strategy in nursing education: a review of the literature.协作测试作为护理教育中的一种学习策略:文献综述
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):171-5.
3
Collaborative essay testing: group work that counts.协作性论文测试:重要的小组作业。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2009;6:Article37. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1845. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
4
Collaborative testing as a learning strategy in nursing education.协作测试作为护理教育中的一种学习策略。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):142-7.
5
Impact of double testing on student knowledge in a professional issues course.双测试对专业问题课程中学生知识的影响。
J Nurs Educ. 2011 May;50(5):278-80. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110131-06. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
6
Impact of collaborative testing on student performance and satisfaction in a chiropractic science course.协作测试对整脊科学课程中学生成绩和满意度的影响。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 May;32(4):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.03.012.
7
Thinking in nursing education. Part I. A student's experience learning to think.护理教育中的思维。第一部分。一名学生学习思考的经历。
Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;20(5):238-42.
8
Use of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal with BSN students.将沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估应用于护理学学士学生。
Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;20(5):253-5.
9
Collaborative learning experiences for nursing students in environmental health.护理专业学生在环境卫生方面的合作学习经历。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):189-91.
10
Assessing the critical thinking skills of faculty: What do the findings mean for nursing education?评估教师的批判性思维能力:研究结果对护理教育有何意义?
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):260-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlocking students' potential beyond traditional exams: the influence of collaborative testing on nursing students' retention and soft skills.超越传统考试挖掘学生潜力:合作测试对护生知识留存率及软技能的影响
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 26;24(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03237-z.
2
Students' Opinions on Summative Team Assessments in a Three-Year Concentrated Pharmacy Curriculum.学生对三年制集中式药学课程终结性团队评估的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Aug 25;80(6):103. doi: 10.5688/ajpe806103.
3
Effect of collaborative testing on learning and retention of course content in nursing students.
协作测试对护理专业学生课程内容学习与记忆的影响。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 Oct;3(4):178-82.