Suppr超能文献

护理教育中的思维。第一部分。一名学生学习思考的经历。

Thinking in nursing education. Part I. A student's experience learning to think.

作者信息

Ironside P M

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health, Clarke College, Dubuque, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;20(5):238-42.

Abstract

Learning to think critically is a central commitment of nursing education. There is a substantial body of literature describing nursing educators' attempts to define critical thinking (1-3) to differentiate critical thinking from other kinds of thinking (1,4), and to measure students' ability (and changes in ability) to think critically (2,5-7). These efforts were facilitated when the National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) identified critical thinking as an outcome criterion for the accrediation of undergraduate and graduate nursing programs. This change in accreditation led to the proliferation of framework (8,9) and strategies (10,11) for nursing educators to use in demonstrating compliance with this criterion. Describing strategies and frameworks for teaching critical thinking is helpful. However, explicating how teachers teach and students learn critical thinking in actual clinical situations illuminates the contextual aspects of practice that influence learning to think (12). Conventional strategies teachers use to assist students to learn critical thinking include individual and group activities, discussions and interactions between students and teachers, clinical simulations, and problem-solving encounters. Although such strategies are commonly thought to be effective in teaching critical thinking in classroom or laboratory situations, little research has been conducted to evaluate the relationship between specific teaching strategies and students' ability to think critically in specific situations (1). A further limitation of laboratory and classroom strategies is that they need to be supplemented with contextual experiences. Providing students with opportunities to practice critical thinking in actual clinical situations is difficult because the context of care is rapidly changing and schools of nursing continue to allocate limited resources to practice education. This two-year study, which was undertaken to reveal common contemporary approaches to teaching and learning critical thinking in clinical courses, analyzes the lived experiences of 45 students and teachers. Part I describes a typical student's experiences of learning "nurse thinking" in the context of clinical practice. Part II describes a typical teacher's experiences creating opportunities for students to learn and practice critical thinking in a community clinical course.

摘要

学会批判性思考是护理教育的核心任务。有大量文献描述了护理教育工作者为定义批判性思维(1-3)、将批判性思维与其他类型的思维区分开来(1,4)以及衡量学生批判性思考能力(及其能力变化)(2,5-7)所做的努力。当美国国家护理联盟认证委员会(NLNAC)将批判性思维确定为本科和研究生护理项目认证的一项成果标准时,这些努力得到了推动。认证方面的这一变化导致了护理教育工作者用于证明符合该标准的框架(8,9)和策略(10,11)的激增。描述批判性思维教学的策略和框架是有帮助的。然而,阐明教师如何教学以及学生如何在实际临床情境中学习批判性思维,能够揭示影响思维学习的实践情境方面(12)。教师用于帮助学生学习批判性思维的传统策略包括个人和小组活动、师生之间的讨论与互动、临床模拟以及解决问题的实践。尽管通常认为这些策略在课堂或实验室情境中教授批判性思维是有效的,但很少有研究评估特定教学策略与学生在特定情境中批判性思考能力之间的关系(1)。实验室和课堂策略的另一个局限性在于,它们需要辅以情境体验。为学生提供在实际临床情境中练习批判性思维的机会很困难,因为护理环境在迅速变化,而护理学院继续将有限的资源分配给实践教育。这项为期两年的研究旨在揭示临床课程中当代常见的批判性思维教学方法,分析了45名学生和教师的实际经历。第一部分描述了一名典型学生在临床实践背景下学习“护士思维”的经历。第二部分描述了一名典型教师在社区临床课程中为学生创造学习和实践批判性思维机会的经历。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验