Suppr超能文献

我是反对我们吗?通过辩证主义来剖析群体内偏爱中的文化差异。

I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of California-Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;37(1):15-27. doi: 10.1177/0146167210388193. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

Abstract

The authors proposed a novel explanation for cultural differences in ingroup favoritism (dialecticism) and tested this hypothesis across cultures/ethnicities, domains, and levels of analysis (explicit vs. implicit, cognitive vs. affective). Dialecticism refers to the cognitive tendency to tolerate contradiction and is more frequently found among East Asian than North American cultures. In Study 1, Chinese were significantly less positive, compared to European Americans, in their explicit judgments of family members. Study 2 investigated ingroup attitudes among Chinese, Latinos, and European Americans. Only Chinese participants showed significant in-group derogation, relative to the other groups, and dialecticism (Dialectical Self Scale) was associated with participants' in group attitudes. Study 3 manipulated dialectical versus linear lay beliefs; participants primed with dialecticism showed more negative, explicit ingroup attitudes. Although ingroup disfavoring tendencies were more prevalent among Chinese across studies, they may be a reflection of one's culturally based lay beliefs rather than deep-rooted negative feelings toward one's ingroup.

摘要

作者提出了一个新颖的解释,用于说明群体内偏爱(辩证思维)的文化差异,并在跨文化/种族、领域和分析层次(显性与隐性、认知与情感)上检验了这一假设。辩证思维是指容忍矛盾的认知倾向,在东亚文化中比在北美文化中更为常见。在研究 1 中,与欧洲裔美国人相比,中国人在对家庭成员的显性判断上明显不那么积极。研究 2 调查了中国人、拉丁裔和欧洲裔美国人的群体内态度。只有中国参与者相对于其他群体表现出明显的群体贬低,并且辩证思维(辩证自我量表)与参与者的群体态度相关。研究 3 操纵了辩证思维与线性思维的基本信念;被辩证思维启动的参与者表现出更消极、更显性的群体内态度。尽管在这些研究中,中国人的群体内不利倾向更为普遍,但这可能反映了一个人基于文化的基本信念,而不是对自己群体的根深蒂固的负面感受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验