• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身高是 MELD 为基础的肝移植分配系统中导致等待名单死亡率存在性别差异的原因之一。

Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2010 Dec;10(12):2658-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x
PMID:21087414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3059496/
Abstract

This study examined factors associated with the gender disparity in wait-list mortality in the MELD era. Adult patients listed for liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008 were included. Females [12 585(36%)] and males [22 126(64%)] differed clinically by age (54 vs. 52 years), height (1.6 vs. 1.8 m), listing estimated glomerular filtration rate [(eGFR); 70 vs. 83 mL/min] and cirrhosis etiology. Holding MELD constant, females were at 19% (95% CI, 1.13-1.25, p < 0.001) higher risk of wait-list mortality than males under the current allocation system. The relative hazard increased with worsening renal function, whether measured by serum creatinine or eGFR. Adjustment for MELD, age, African-American race, cirrhosis etiology, region and ABO group attenuated this relative hazard (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22; p < 0.001) but additional adjustment for height completely explained this gender disparity in wait-list mortality (HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12; p = 0.2). Transplantation rates, however, remained lower among females, even after adjustment for height (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92; p < 0.001). In conclusion, under the current liver allocation system, women have a 19% increased risk of wait-list mortality compared to men with the same MELD scores. Height contributes to this gender disparity, possibly reflecting differences in transplantation rates for shorter individuals.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 MELD 时代等待名单死亡率性别差异的相关因素。纳入 2002 年至 2008 年接受肝移植的成年患者。女性[12585 例(36%)]和男性[22126 例(64%)]在年龄(54 岁比 52 岁)、身高(1.6 米比 1.8 米)、登记肾小球滤过率[eGFR;70 毫升/分比 83 毫升/分]和肝硬化病因方面存在差异。在 MELD 不变的情况下,当前分配系统下,女性等待名单死亡率比男性高 19%(95%可信区间,1.13-1.25,p<0.001)。无论采用血清肌酐还是 eGFR 来衡量,肾功能恶化时,相对危险度均升高。调整 MELD、年龄、非裔美国人种族、肝硬化病因、地区和 ABO 组后,该相对危险度降低(HR 1.16;95%可信区间,1.10-1.22;p<0.001),但进一步调整身高后,完全解释了等待名单死亡率的性别差异(HR 1.05;95%可信区间,0.98-1.12;p=0.2)。然而,即使调整了身高,女性的移植率仍然较低(HR 0.88;95%可信区间,0.82-0.92;p<0.001)。总之,在当前的肝脏分配系统下,女性与 MELD 评分相同的男性相比,等待名单死亡率增加了 19%。身高导致了这种性别差异,可能反映了身高较矮者的移植率差异。

相似文献

1
Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system.身高是 MELD 为基础的肝移植分配系统中导致等待名单死亡率存在性别差异的原因之一。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Dec;10(12):2658-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
2
MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era.MELD 3.0:适应新时代的终末期肝病模型。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Dec;161(6):1887-1895.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
3
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
4
Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate.性别、肾功能和肝移植等待名单上的结局:评估包括估算肾小球滤过率的改良 MELD。
J Hepatol. 2011 Mar;54(3):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
5
Factors that affect deceased donor liver transplantation rates in the United States in addition to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score.除终末期肝病模型评分外,影响美国尸体供肝移植率的因素。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Dec;18(12):1456-63. doi: 10.1002/lt.23548.
6
Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分低的肝移植候选者的结局
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1403-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24307.
7
Systematic Sex-Based Inequity in the MELD Score-Based Allocation System for Liver Transplantation in Germany.德国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝移植分配系统中存在基于性别的系统性不平等。
Transpl Int. 2025 Jan 29;38:13844. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.13844. eCollection 2025.
8
Moderate ascites identifies patients with low model for end-stage liver disease scores awaiting liver transplantation who have a high mortality risk.中等量腹水可识别出等待肝移植的低终末期肝病模型评分患者,此类患者具有较高的死亡风险。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Feb;17(2):129-36. doi: 10.1002/lt.22218.
9
Variation in intention-to-treat survival by MELD subtypes: All models created for end-stage liver disease are not equal.终末期肝病模型(MELD)各亚型意向性治疗生存率的差异:为终末期肝病建立的所有模型并不相同。
J Hepatol. 2025 Feb;82(2):268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
10
Waiting list mortality of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis in the Japanese transplant allocation system.原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者在日本移植分配系统中的候补者死亡率。
J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;49(2):324-31. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0782-5. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in severity, outcomes, and healthcare utilization in alcohol-associated hepatitis.酒精性肝炎在严重程度、预后及医疗利用方面的性别差异。
World J Hepatol. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):108063. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.108063.
2
Distinct liver sections exhibit sex-specific gene expression patterns in Lewis rats.在刘易斯大鼠中,不同的肝脏切片呈现出性别特异性的基因表达模式。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17729-0.
3
Sex Differences in Excess Mortality Among Waitlisted Kidney, Heart, and Liver Transplant Candidates.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in liver transplantation in the post-model for end-stage liver disease era: are we there yet?
Hepatology. 2009 Sep;50(3):981-4. doi: 10.1002/hep.22939.
2
Race and sex disparities in liver transplantation: progress toward achieving equal access?肝移植中的种族和性别差异:在实现平等获取方面取得的进展?
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2425-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.732.
3
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分引入前后肝移植的差异。
等待肾、心脏和肝脏移植的候选者中过高死亡率的性别差异。
Transplant Direct. 2025 Aug 22;11(9):e1856. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001856. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Sex Differences in Risk of Adverse Liver Events in Patients With Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者不良肝脏事件风险的性别差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523674. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23674.
5
Sex-based Differences and Comparative Predictive Value of MELD 3.0 in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Waitlist Outcomes After Standardization of Listing Criteria in the United States.美国肝脏移植标准统一后,肝肾联合移植等待名单结果中基于性别的差异及MELD 3.0的比较预测价值
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1781. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001781. eCollection 2025 May.
6
Lesson learnt from 60 years of liver transplantation: Advancements, challenges, and future directions.从60年肝移植中汲取的经验教训:进展、挑战与未来方向。
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):93253. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.93253.
7
A Comprehensive Assessment of Liver Transplant Trends and Outcomes Among Adults With Steatotic Liver Disease in the U.S.美国成人脂肪性肝病患者肝移植趋势与结局的综合评估
Gastro Hep Adv. 2024 Dec 27;4(4):100609. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100609. eCollection 2025.
8
Systematic Sex-Based Inequity in the MELD Score-Based Allocation System for Liver Transplantation in Germany.德国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝移植分配系统中存在基于性别的系统性不平等。
Transpl Int. 2025 Jan 29;38:13844. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.13844. eCollection 2025.
9
Patient sex and use of tranexamic acid in liver transplantation.肝移植中患者性别与氨甲环酸的使用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 23;11:1452733. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1452733. eCollection 2024.
10
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.性别和大小差异在获得肝移植治疗肝细胞癌患者的机会。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498.
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
4
Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006.1997 - 2006年美国的肝脏和肠道移植
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):958-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02174.x.
5
Is the corrected-creatinine model for end-stage liver disease a feasible strategy to adjust gender difference in organ allocation for liver transplantation?用于终末期肝病的校正肌酐模型是调整肝移植器官分配中性别差异的可行策略吗?
Transplantation. 2007 Dec 15;84(11):1406-12. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000282867.92367.d0.
6
Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores--a systematic bias.与男性肝移植受者肾小球滤过率(GFR)相同的女性肝移植受者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分较低——一种系统偏差。
Am J Transplant. 2007 Mar;7(3):685-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01666.x. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
7
Deaths on the liver transplant waiting list: an analysis of competing risks.肝移植等待名单上的死亡情况:竞争风险分析
Hepatology. 2006 Feb;43(2):345-51. doi: 10.1002/hep.21025.
8
Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites.黑人和白人在原位肝移植使用方面的差异。
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jul;10(7):834-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.20174.
9
Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan.新肝脏分配计划第一年的结果。
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jan;10(1):7-15. doi: 10.1002/lt.20024.
10
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)与供肝分配
Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50016.