Suppr超能文献

支架植入术后炎症生物标志物在风险评估中的作用演变。

The evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in risk assessment after stent implantation.

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 23;56(22):1783-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.045.

Abstract

The main adverse reactions to coronary stents are in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis. Along with procedural factors, individual susceptibility to these events plays an important role. In particular, inflammatory status, as assessed by C-reactive protein levels, predicts the risk of ISR after bare-metal stent implantation, although it does not predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Conversely, C-reactive protein levels fail to predict the risk of ISR after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, although they appear to predict the risk of stent thrombosis. Of note, DES have abated ISR rates occurring in the classical 1-year window, but new concern is emerging regarding late restenosis and thrombosis. The pathogenesis of these late events seems to be related to delayed healing and allergic reactions to polymers, a process in which eosinophils seem to play an important role by enhancing restenosis and thrombosis. The identification of high-risk individuals based on biomarker assessment may be important for the management of patients receiving stent implantation. In this report, we review the evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the risk of ISR and stent thrombosis.

摘要

冠状动脉支架的主要不良反应是支架内再狭窄(ISR)和支架内血栓形成。除了手术因素外,个体对这些事件的易感性也起着重要作用。特别是,C 反应蛋白水平评估的炎症状态可预测裸金属支架植入后的 ISR 风险,尽管它不能预测支架内血栓形成的风险。相反,C 反应蛋白水平不能预测药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后的 ISR 风险,尽管它们似乎可以预测支架内血栓形成的风险。值得注意的是,DES 降低了经典的 1 年窗口期内发生的 ISR 发生率,但新的关注点是晚期再狭窄和血栓形成。这些晚期事件的发病机制似乎与延迟愈合和对聚合物的过敏反应有关,在这个过程中,嗜酸性粒细胞似乎通过增强再狭窄和血栓形成而发挥重要作用。基于生物标志物评估识别高危个体可能对接受支架植入的患者的管理很重要。在本报告中,我们回顾了炎症生物标志物在预测 ISR 和支架内血栓形成风险方面的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验