• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架不良反应的炎症机制。

Inflammatory mechanisms of adverse reactions to drug-eluting stents.

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;11(4):392-8. doi: 10.2174/1570161111311040003.

DOI:10.2174/1570161111311040003
PMID:23905634
Abstract

In-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis represent the main adverse reactions to coronary stents and individual susceptibility appears to play an important role in their onset. In particular, inflammatory status, classically assessed by C-reactive protein levels, predicts the risk of in-stent restenosis after bare-metal stent implantation but not after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. On the other hand, C-reactive protein seems to predict the risk of stent thrombosis after treatment with DES but not with bare-metal stent. If DES have considerably reduced, as compared to bare-metal stent, the rate of adverse reaction in the first year after implantation, concern is emerging about late events that seem to be related to delayed healing and allergic reactions to polymers, a process in which eosinophils play an important role by enhancing restenosis and thrombosis.

摘要

支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成是冠状动脉支架的主要不良反应,个体易感性似乎在其发病中起着重要作用。特别是,炎症状态,经典地通过 C 反应蛋白水平来评估,预测裸金属支架植入后的支架内再狭窄风险,但不预测药物洗脱支架 (DES) 植入后的风险。另一方面,C 反应蛋白似乎预测 DES 治疗后支架内血栓形成的风险,但不预测裸金属支架治疗后的风险。如果 DES 与裸金属支架相比,在植入后第一年的不良反应发生率显著降低,那么人们开始关注似乎与延迟愈合和对聚合物的过敏反应相关的晚期事件,这一过程中嗜酸性粒细胞通过促进再狭窄和血栓形成起着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Inflammatory mechanisms of adverse reactions to drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架不良反应的炎症机制。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;11(4):392-8. doi: 10.2174/1570161111311040003.
2
The evolving role of inflammatory biomarkers in risk assessment after stent implantation.支架植入术后炎症生物标志物在风险评估中的作用演变。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 23;56(22):1783-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.045.
3
[Clinical value of inflammatory biomarkers after stent implantation].[支架植入术后炎症生物标志物的临床价值]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2011 Oct;12(10):635-44. doi: 10.1714/945.10348.
4
Comparison between catheter-based delivery of paclitaxel after bare-metal stenting and drug-eluting stents in coronary artery disease patients at high risk for in-stent restenosis.裸金属支架置入术后基于导管的紫杉醇给药与药物洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病支架内再狭窄高危患者中的比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Dec;18(8):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架的支架血栓形成:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
Lancet. 2012 Apr 14;379(9824):1393-402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60324-9. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
6
Clinical presentation and outcome of patients hospitalized for symptomatic in-stent restenosis treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents.因症状性支架内再狭窄住院并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床表现及预后:药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Mar;102(3):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
7
Stent thrombosis and drug-eluting stents.支架血栓形成和药物洗脱支架。
J Cardiol. 2011 Sep;58(2):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
Inflammatory mechanisms of adverse reactions to BMS.BMS 不良反应的炎症机制。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;11(4):379-91. doi: 10.2174/1570161111311040002.
9
Therapies targeting inflammation after stent implantation.支架植入术后针对炎症的治疗方法。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;11(4):399-406. doi: 10.2174/1570161111311040004.
10
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents: is the paradigm shifting?药物洗脱支架血栓形成:范式是否正在转变?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1915-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.725. Epub 2013 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoatherosclerosis: A Distinctive Pathological Mechanism of Stent Failure.新型动脉粥样硬化:支架失败的独特病理机制
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 7;25(3):95. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503095. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Five-year outcomes of biodegradable versus second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents used in complex percutaneous coronary intervention.生物可降解与第二代持久聚合物药物洗脱支架在复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的 5 年结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Feb 5;136(3):322-330. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002450.
3
Evaluation of rs1748195 ANGPTL3 gene polymorphism in patients with angiographic coronary artery disease compared to healthy individuals.
评价 rs1748195 ANGPTL3 基因多态性在伴有血管造影的冠状动脉疾病患者与健康个体中的差异。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023 Mar;11(3):e2105. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2105. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Hypersensitivity and in-stent restenosis in coronary stent materials.冠状动脉支架材料中的超敏反应和支架内再狭窄。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 15;10:1003322. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1003322. eCollection 2022.
5
Clonal diversity of the B cell receptor repertoire in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and type 2 diabetes.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄患者和2型糖尿病患者B细胞受体库的克隆多样性
Open Life Sci. 2021 Aug 28;16(1):884-898. doi: 10.1515/biol-2021-0091. eCollection 2021.
6
Value of S100A12 in predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.S100A12在预测冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入患者支架内再狭窄中的价值。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Jul;20(1):211-218. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8721. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Psoriasis is an independent predictor of increased risk of allergic reaction during percutaneous coronary interventions. Big data analysis from the Polish National PCI Registry (ORPKI).银屑病是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中过敏反应风险增加的独立预测因素。来自波兰国家 PCI 登记处(ORPKI)的大数据分析。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(3):278-284. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0076. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Continuation of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Revascularization with a Drug-Eluting Stent: What Duration Is Optimal?药物洗脱支架经皮血管重建术后双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:最佳时长是多久?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Nov;17(11):63. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0543-4.