Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jan;26(1):134-42. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq263. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
Laparoscopy has been claimed to be superior to hysterosalpingography (HSG) in predicting fertility. Whether this conclusion is applicable to a general subfertile population can be questioned as data in support of this claim were collected in third line centres. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic capacity of HSG and laparoscopy in a general subfertile population.
In 38 centres, we prospectively studied a cohort of patients referred for subfertility between 2002 and 2004, who underwent HSG and/or laparoscopy as part of their subfertility work-up. Follow-up started immediately after tubal testing and ended 12 months thereafter. Time to pregnancy was censored at the of date last contact, when the woman was not pregnant or at the start of treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves for the occurrence of spontaneous intrauterine pregnancy were constructed for patients without tubal pathology, for those with unilateral tubal pathology and for patients with bilateral tubal pathology at HSG or laparoscopy. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to calculate fecundity rate ratios (FRRs) to express associations between tubal pathology and the occurrence of an intrauterine pregnancy.
Of the 3301 included patients, 2043 underwent HSG only, 747 underwent diagnostic laparoscopy only and 511 underwent both. At HSG, 322 (13%) patients showed unilateral tubal pathology and 135 (5%) showed bilateral tubal pathology. At laparoscopy, 167 (13%) showed unilateral tubal pathology and 215 (17%) showed bilateral tubal pathology. Multivariable analysis resulted in FRRs of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-1.1] for unilateral, and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.13-0.59) for bilateral, tubal pathology at HSG. The FRRs at laparoscopy were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.47-1.52) for unilateral, and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.11-0.54) for bilateral, tubal pathology.
Patients with unilateral tubal pathology at HSG and laparoscopy had a moderate reduction in pregnancy chances, whereas those with bilateral tubal pathology at HSG and laparoscopy had a severe reduction in pregnancy chances. This reduction was similar for HSG and laparoscopy, suggesting that HSG and laparoscopy have a comparable predictive capacity for natural conception.
腹腔镜检查被认为在预测生育能力方面优于子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)。然而,这一结论是否适用于一般的不孕人群,这是值得怀疑的,因为支持这一结论的数据是在三线中心收集的。本研究旨在评估 HSG 和腹腔镜检查在一般不孕人群中的预测能力。
在 38 个中心,我们前瞻性地研究了 2002 年至 2004 年间因不孕而就诊的患者队列,这些患者在不孕检查中接受了 HSG 和/或腹腔镜检查。随访从输卵管检查后立即开始,持续 12 个月。无输卵管病变的患者,单侧输卵管病变患者和 HSG 或腹腔镜检查中双侧输卵管病变的患者,在妊娠时被剔除。对于没有输卵管病变的患者、单侧输卵管病变的患者和 HSG 或腹腔镜检查中双侧输卵管病变的患者,构建了自然宫内妊娠发生的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线。多变量 Cox 回归分析用于计算输卵管病变与宫内妊娠发生之间的生育率比(FRR),以表达输卵管病变与宫内妊娠发生之间的关联。
在 3301 名纳入的患者中,2043 名仅接受了 HSG 检查,747 名仅接受了诊断性腹腔镜检查,511 名同时接受了这两种检查。在 HSG 检查中,322 名(13%)患者单侧输卵管病变,135 名(5%)患者双侧输卵管病变。腹腔镜检查中,167 名(13%)患者单侧输卵管病变,215 名(17%)患者双侧输卵管病变。多变量分析得出,HSG 检查中单侧输卵管病变的 FRR 为 0.81(95%置信区间[CI]:0.59-1.1),双侧输卵管病变的 FRR 为 0.28(95% CI:0.13-0.59)。腹腔镜检查中,单侧输卵管病变的 FRR 为 0.85(95% CI:0.47-1.52),双侧输卵管病变的 FRR 为 0.24(95% CI:0.11-0.54)。
HSG 和腹腔镜检查中单侧输卵管病变的患者妊娠机会中度降低,而 HSG 和腹腔镜检查中双侧输卵管病变的患者妊娠机会严重降低。HSG 和腹腔镜检查的降低程度相似,表明 HSG 和腹腔镜检查对自然受孕具有相当的预测能力。