• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响抗生素扩散试验优化的因素。

Factors influencing optimization of diffusion assays for antibiotics.

作者信息

Brady M S, Katz S E

机构信息

Rutgers State University of New Jersey, Cook College, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, New Brunswick 08903-0231.

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990 Mar-Apr;73(2):202-5.

PMID:2108955
Abstract

Agar nutrient content, cylinder charge volume, thickness (volume) of the agar layer, and incubation temperature were 4 factors varied to determine their effect(s) on the optimization of the cylinder-plate diffusion assay. Chlortetracycline was the pilot antibiotic and Bacillus cereus was used as the assay organism. Zones of inhibition were larger when the incubation temperature was lower than that which was commonly used and/or when the nutrient level was decreased; the zones were smaller when the incubation temperature was raised and/or when an increased nutrient level was used. The thickness (volume) of the assay layer played the most important role; the thinner the layer the less the effect the cylinder charge volume had on the zone diameter. The slopes of the response lines were minimally affected by cylinder charge volume. For a 7 mL assay layer per standard Petri plate, cylinder charge volumes ranging from 150 to 250 microL had little effect on zone diameter. The linearity of the response line was unaffected by assay layer thickness (volume), nutrient level, temperature of incubation, or cylinder charge volume. As long as the conditions for the assay were standardized, there were no discernible effects on recoveries or potencies.

摘要

琼脂营养成分、圆筒装样体积、琼脂层厚度(体积)和培养温度是4个可变因素,用于确定它们对圆筒平板扩散试验优化的影响。金霉素是试验抗生素,蜡样芽孢杆菌用作试验微生物。当培养温度低于常用温度和/或营养水平降低时,抑菌圈更大;当培养温度升高和/或使用更高营养水平时,抑菌圈更小。试验层的厚度(体积)起最重要作用;层越薄,圆筒装样体积对抑菌圈直径的影响越小。响应线的斜率受圆筒装样体积的影响最小。对于每个标准培养皿7 mL的试验层,150至250微升的圆筒装样体积对抑菌圈直径影响很小。响应线的线性不受试验层厚度(体积)、营养水平、培养温度或圆筒装样体积的影响。只要试验条件标准化,对回收率或效价就没有明显影响。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing optimization of diffusion assays for antibiotics.影响抗生素扩散试验优化的因素。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990 Mar-Apr;73(2):202-5.
2
Effect of volume of solution per cylinder on estimation of antibiotic potency in diffusion assay.每个圆柱体溶液体积对扩散试验中抗生素效价估计的影响。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Sep-Oct;71(5):1071-4.
3
Microbial diffusion assay for antibiotics in feeds using a simplified design.采用简化设计的饲料中抗生素微生物扩散测定法。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Jul-Aug;71(4):717-20.
4
An improved microbiological assay for chlortetracycline in avian plasma.一种改进的用于检测禽血浆中四环素的微生物学测定法。
Avian Dis. 1986 Jul-Sep;30(3):574-9.
5
[Standardization of the nutrient medium for determining the biological activity of a number of antibiotics by the diffusion-in-agar method].[通过琼脂扩散法测定多种抗生素生物活性的营养培养基标准化]
Antibiotiki. 1983 Apr;28(4):250-4.
6
[A method of diffusion in agar for determining streptococcal sensitivity to antibiotics].一种用于测定链球菌对抗生素敏感性的琼脂扩散法
Antibiotiki. 1984 Oct;29(10):760-5.
7
Agar well technique for antibiotics in animal feeds.动物饲料中抗生素的琼脂扩散法
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1975 Jan;58(1):95-8.
8
[Introduction of the inoculum into the upper agar layer as an alternative method in determining microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics by diffusion in agar].
Antibiotiki. 1984 Aug;29(8):585-90.
9
Simplified plate diffusion system for microbial assays of antibiotics.用于抗生素微生物检测的简化平板扩散系统。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Jul-Aug;70(4):641-6.
10
Antibiotic identification by high voltage electrophoresis bioautography.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1985 Sep-Oct;68(5):1018-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement in Violacein Production by Utilizing Formic Acid to Induce Quorum Sensing in .利用甲酸诱导群体感应提高紫菌素产量 (原文中“in.”后面内容缺失)
Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;11(5):849. doi: 10.3390/antiox11050849.