Suppr超能文献

临终时家庭决策中的理性选择模型。

The rational choice model in family decision making at the end of life.

作者信息

Karasz Alison, Sacajiu Galit, Kogan Misha, Watkins Liza

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2010 Fall;21(3):189-200.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most end-of-life decisions are made by family members. Current ethical guidelines for family decision making are based on a hierarchical model that emphasizes the patient's wishes over his or her best interests. Evidence suggests that the model poorly reflects the strategies and priorities of many families.

METHODS

Researchers observed and recorded 26 decision-making meetings between hospital staff and family members. Semi-structured follow-up interviews were conducted. Transcriptions were analyzed using qualitative techniques.

RESULTS

For both staff and families, consideration of a patient's best interests generally took priority over the patient's wishes. Staff generally introduced discussion of the patient's wishes for rhetorical purposes, such as persuasion. Competing moral frameworks, which de-emphasized the salience of patients' autonomy and "right to choose," played a role in family decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

The priority given to the patients' wishes in the hierarchical model does not reflect the priorities of staff and families in making decisions about end-of-life care.

摘要

背景

大多数临终决策由家庭成员做出。当前关于家庭决策的伦理准则基于一种等级模型,该模型强调患者的意愿高于其最佳利益。有证据表明,该模型未能很好地反映许多家庭的策略和优先事项。

方法

研究人员观察并记录了26次医院工作人员与家庭成员之间的决策会议。进行了半结构化的后续访谈。使用定性技术对转录内容进行了分析。

结果

对于工作人员和家庭而言,考虑患者的最佳利益通常优先于患者的意愿。工作人员通常出于修辞目的(如劝说)引入对患者意愿的讨论。相互竞争的道德框架淡化了患者自主权和“选择权”的重要性,在家庭决策中发挥了作用。

结论

等级模型中给予患者意愿的优先地位并未反映出工作人员和家庭在做出临终护理决策时的优先事项。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验