• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物与安慰剂效应的相互作用:一项交叉平衡安慰剂设计试验。

Interaction between drug and placebo effects: a cross-over balanced placebo design trial.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Studies and Empirical Ethics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Trials. 2010 Nov 19;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-110.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-11-110
PMID:21092089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2995791/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The total effect of a medication is the sum of its drug effect, placebo effect (meaning response), and their possible interaction. Current interpretation of clinical trials' results assumes no interaction. Demonstrating such an interaction has been difficult due to lack of an appropriate study design.

METHODS

180 adults were randomized to caffeine (300 mg) or placebo groups. Each group received the assigned intervention described by the investigators as caffeine or placebo, in a randomized crossover design. 4-hour-area-under-the-curve of energy, sleepiness, nausea (on 100 mm visual analog scales), and systolic blood pressure levels as well as caffeine pharmacokinetics (in 22 volunteers nested in the caffeine group) were determined. Caffeine drug, placebo, placebo-plus-interaction, and total effects were estimated by comparing outcomes after, receiving caffeine described as placebo to receiving placebo described as placebo, receiving placebo described as caffeine or placebo, receiving caffeine described as caffeine or placebo, and receiving caffeine described as caffeine to receiving placebo described as placebo, respectively.

RESULTS

The placebo effect on area-under-the-curve of energy (mean difference) and sleepiness (geometric mean ratio) was larger than placebo-plus-interaction effect (16.6 [95% CI, 4.1 to 29.0] vs. 8.4 [-4.2 to 21.0] mmhr and 0.58 [0.39 to 0.86] vs. 0.69 [0.49 to 0.97], respectively), similar in size to drug effect (20.8 [3.8 to 37.8] mmhr and 0.49 [0.30 to 0.91], respectively), and its combination with the later was larger than total caffeine effect (29.5 [11.9 to 47.1] mm*hr and 0.37 [0.22 to 0.64]). Placebo-plus-interaction effect increased caffeine terminal half-life by 0.40 [0.12 to 0.68] hr (P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug and placebo effects of a medication may be less than additive, which influences the interpretation of clinical trials. The placebo effect may increase active drug terminal half-life, a novel mechanism of placebo action.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identification number - NCT00426010.

摘要

背景

药物的总效应是其药效、安慰剂效应(即反应)及其可能相互作用的总和。目前对临床试验结果的解释假设不存在相互作用。由于缺乏适当的研究设计,证明这种相互作用一直很困难。

方法

180 名成年人被随机分配到咖啡因(300mg)或安慰剂组。每组按照研究者的描述接受分配的干预措施,即咖啡因或安慰剂,采用随机交叉设计。4 小时能量曲线下面积、嗜睡、恶心(100mm 视觉模拟量表)和收缩压水平以及咖啡因药代动力学(在 22 名嵌套在咖啡因组中的志愿者中)均已确定。通过比较接受描述为安慰剂的咖啡因和接受描述为安慰剂的咖啡因后得出的咖啡因药物、安慰剂、安慰剂加相互作用和总效应的结果,以及接受描述为咖啡因或安慰剂的咖啡因和接受描述为咖啡因或安慰剂的安慰剂,以及接受描述为咖啡因的咖啡因与接受描述为安慰剂的咖啡因相比,分别接受描述为安慰剂的咖啡因。

结果

能量曲线下面积(平均差异)和嗜睡(几何均数比)的安慰剂效应大于安慰剂加相互作用效应(16.6[95%CI,4.1 至 29.0]与 8.4[-4.2 至 21.0]mmhr 和 0.58[0.39 至 0.86]与 0.69[0.49 至 0.97]),与药物效应(20.8[3.8 至 37.8]mmhr 和 0.49[0.30 至 0.91])相似,且两者的组合大于总咖啡因效应(29.5[11.9 至 47.1]mm*hr 和 0.37[0.22 至 0.64])。安慰剂加相互作用效应使咖啡因终末半衰期延长 0.40[0.12 至 0.68]hr(P=0.007)。

结论

药物和安慰剂的药物作用可能小于加和,这会影响临床试验的解释。安慰剂效应可能会增加活性药物的终末半衰期,这是安慰剂作用的一种新机制。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符-NCT00426010。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/733ae1dc118e/1745-6215-11-110-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/021f891e326f/1745-6215-11-110-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/b4ad0b15e67d/1745-6215-11-110-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/bd5002bad07e/1745-6215-11-110-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/733ae1dc118e/1745-6215-11-110-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/021f891e326f/1745-6215-11-110-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/b4ad0b15e67d/1745-6215-11-110-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/bd5002bad07e/1745-6215-11-110-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1b/2995791/733ae1dc118e/1745-6215-11-110-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Interaction between drug and placebo effects: a cross-over balanced placebo design trial.药物与安慰剂效应的相互作用:一项交叉平衡安慰剂设计试验。
Trials. 2010 Nov 19;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-110.
2
Drug*placebo interaction effect may bias clinical trials interpretation: hybrid balanced placebo and randomized placebo-controlled design.药物*安慰剂相互作用效应可能会使临床试验解释产生偏差:混合平衡安慰剂和随机安慰剂对照设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0269-1.
3
Does the placebo effect modulate drug bioavailability? Randomized cross-over studies of three drugs.安慰剂效应会调节药物的生物利用度吗?三种药物的随机交叉研究。
J Negat Results Biomed. 2017 May 23;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12952-017-0075-2.
4
Large Intra-subject Variability in Caffeine Pharmacokinetics: Randomized Cross-over Study of Single Caffeine Product.咖啡因药代动力学的个体内差异较大:单一咖啡因产品的随机交叉研究
Drug Res (Stuttg). 2017 Sep;67(9):539-546. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110144. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Caffeine-herbal ephedra combination increases resting energy expenditure, heart rate and blood pressure.咖啡因与麻黄草的组合会增加静息能量消耗、心率和血压。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005 Jan-Feb;32(1-2):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04152.x.
6
7
The cardiovascular interaction between caffeine and nicotine in humans.咖啡因与尼古丁对人体心血管系统的相互作用。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Aug;54(2):194-204. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1993.131.
8
Efficacy of diclofenac sodium softgel 100 mg with or without caffeine 100 mg in migraine without aura: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.含或不含100毫克咖啡因的100毫克双氯芬酸钠软胶囊治疗无先兆偏头痛的疗效:一项随机、双盲、交叉研究。
Headache. 2004 Feb;44(2):136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04029.x.
9
Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.米托蒽醌:其在多发性硬化症中的应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):379-96. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418060-00010.
10
Influence of grapefruit juice on caffeine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.葡萄柚汁对咖啡因药代动力学和药效学的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 1996 Nov-Dec;16(6):1046-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing placebo: Lessons from psychedelic science.利用安慰剂:迷幻科学的启示。
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Sep;37(9):866-875. doi: 10.1177/02698811231182602. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Adenosine, caffeine, and sleep-wake regulation: state of the science and perspectives.腺苷、咖啡因与睡眠-觉醒调节:科学现状与展望。
J Sleep Res. 2022 Aug;31(4):e13597. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13597. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
How do they add up? The interaction between the placebo and treatment effect: A systematic review.它们如何相加?安慰剂和治疗效果的相互作用:系统评价。

本文引用的文献

1
Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention.随机临床试验中的自发改善:比较无治疗、安慰剂和积极干预的三臂试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 5;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-1.
2
Do patients' preferences matter?患者的偏好重要吗?
BMJ. 2008 Oct 31;337:a2034. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2034.
3
Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis.随机试验中患者的偏好:系统评价与患者层面的荟萃分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;88(8):3638-3656. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15345. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Lay People's Ethical Attitudes To Placebo Treatment: A Q-Methodology Study.普通民众对安慰剂治疗的伦理态度:一项Q方法学研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Sep 27;13:1599-1617. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S216565. eCollection 2019.
5
The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies.疼痛治疗中的安慰剂效应。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Jan 6;59:191-211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021542. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
6
Does the placebo effect modulate drug bioavailability? Randomized cross-over studies of three drugs.安慰剂效应会调节药物的生物利用度吗?三种药物的随机交叉研究。
J Negat Results Biomed. 2017 May 23;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12952-017-0075-2.
7
Does the model of additive effect in placebo research still hold true? A narrative review.安慰剂研究中的相加效应模型是否仍然成立?一项叙述性综述。
JRSM Open. 2017 Feb 1;8(3):2054270416681434. doi: 10.1177/2054270416681434. eCollection 2017 Mar.
8
Drug*placebo interaction effect may bias clinical trials interpretation: hybrid balanced placebo and randomized placebo-controlled design.药物*安慰剂相互作用效应可能会使临床试验解释产生偏差:混合平衡安慰剂和随机安慰剂对照设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0269-1.
9
Cumulative neurobehavioral and physiological effects of chronic caffeine intake: individual differences and implications for the use of caffeinated energy products.长期摄入咖啡因的累积神经行为和生理影响:个体差异及对含咖啡因能量产品使用的启示
Nutr Rev. 2014 Oct;72 Suppl 1(0 1):34-47. doi: 10.1111/nure.12151.
10
Randomised controlled trials may underestimate drug effects: balanced placebo trial design.随机对照试验可能低估药物效果:平衡安慰剂试验设计。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e84104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084104. eCollection 2014.
BMJ. 2008 Oct 31;337:a1864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1864.
4
The antidepressant debate and the balanced placebo trial design: an ethical analysis.抗抑郁药物之争与平衡安慰剂试验设计:一项伦理学分析
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;31(6):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
5
Prescribing "placebo treatments": results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologists.开具“安慰剂治疗”:美国内科医生和风湿病学家全国调查结果
BMJ. 2008 Oct 23;337:a1938. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1938.
6
Separating the effects of alcohol and expectancy on brain activation: an fMRI working memory study.区分酒精和预期对大脑激活的影响:一项功能磁共振成像工作记忆研究。
Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1587-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.037. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
7
Placebo effects: clinical aspects and neurobiology.安慰剂效应:临床方面与神经生物学
Brain. 2008 Nov;131(Pt 11):2812-23. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn116. Epub 2008 Jun 21.
8
What is the placebo worth?安慰剂的价值是什么?
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):967-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39535.344201.BE. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
9
Commercial features of placebo and therapeutic efficacy.安慰剂的商业特性与治疗效果。
JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1016-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1016.
10
Timing of blood pressure measurement related to caffeine consumption.与咖啡因摄入相关的血压测量时间
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jan;42(1):105-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K337. Epub 2007 Dec 19.