• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有何新发现?儿童在参照选择中更偏好新颖性。

What's new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):234-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.015. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.015
PMID:21092945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3022084/
Abstract

Determining the referent of a novel name is a critical task for young language learners. The majority of studies on children's referent selection focus on manipulating the sources of information (linguistic, contextual and pragmatic) that children can use to solve the referent mapping problem. Here, we take a step back and explore how children's endogenous biases towards novelty and their own familiarity with novel objects influence their performance in such a task. We familiarized 2-year-old children with previously novel objects. Then, on novel name referent selection trials children were asked to select the referent from three novel objects: two previously seen and one completely novel object. Children demonstrated a clear bias to select the most novel object. A second experiment controls for pragmatic responding and replicates this finding. We conclude, therefore, that children's referent selection is biased by previous exposure and children's endogenous bias to novelty.

摘要

确定一个新名词的所指是年轻语言学习者的一项关键任务。大多数关于儿童所指选择的研究都集中在操纵儿童可以用来解决所指映射问题的信息来源(语言的、语境的和语用的)上。在这里,我们退一步探讨儿童对新奇事物的内在偏见以及他们对新奇物体的熟悉程度如何影响他们在这种任务中的表现。我们让 2 岁的儿童熟悉以前的新奇物体。然后,在选择新名词所指的试验中,儿童被要求从三个新物体中选择所指:两个之前见过的和一个完全新的物体。儿童明显有选择最不熟悉物体的倾向。第二个实验控制了语用反应,并复制了这一发现。因此,我们得出结论,儿童的所指选择受到先前接触和儿童对新奇事物的内在偏见的影响。

相似文献

1
What's new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection.有何新发现?儿童在参照选择中更偏好新颖性。
Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):234-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.015. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
2
Young children's referent selection is guided by novelty for both words and actions.幼儿的指称选择受单词和动作新颖性的引导。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jun;146:231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Reprint of "Young children's referent selection is guided by novelty for both words and actions".《幼儿的指称选择受单词和动作新颖性的引导》重印版
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Nov;151:33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
Too Much of a Good Thing: How Novelty Biases and Vocabulary Influence Known and Novel Referent Selection in 18-Month-Old Children and Associative Learning Models.过犹不及:新奇偏好和词汇如何影响18个月大婴儿及联想学习模型中已知和新奇指称对象的选择
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):463-493. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12610. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Pragmatics aid referent disambiguation and word learning in young children and adults.语用学有助于儿童和成人消除指代歧义并学习单词。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jul;26(4):e13363. doi: 10.1111/desc.13363. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
The role of competition in word learning via referent selection.竞争在通过参照选择进行词汇学习中的作用。
Dev Sci. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):706-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00926.x.
7
How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects.两岁儿童如何理解不熟悉物体的专有名称和普通名称。
Child Dev. 1984 Aug;55(4):1535-40.
8
Rapid fast-mapping abilities in 2-year-olds.2 岁儿童快速映射能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 May;109(1):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.013. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
9
Young children's expectation of competence in word learning.幼儿对词汇学习能力的期望。
J Child Lang. 2006 May;33(2):321-38. doi: 10.1017/s0305000906007343.
10
Caregivers as experimenters: Reducing unfamiliarity helps shy children learn words.照顾者作为实验者:减少陌生感有助于害羞的孩子学习单词。
Infancy. 2024 Nov-Dec;29(6):877-893. doi: 10.1111/infa.12623. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the performance of a large language model and naive human interviewers in interviewing children about a witnessed mock-event.比较大型语言模型与天真的人类面试官在就一起目睹的模拟事件询问儿童时的表现。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0316317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316317. eCollection 2025.
2
A library for innovative category exemplars (ALICE) database: Streamlining research with printable 3D novel objects.创新类别范例库(ALICE)数据库:使用可打印的 3D 新对象简化研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7849-7871. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02458-5. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Formal theories clarify the complex: Generalizing a neural process account of the interaction of visual exploration and word learning in infancy.正式理论阐明了复杂性:将婴儿期视觉探索和词汇学习的神经过程解释推广。
Child Dev. 2023 Nov-Dec;94(6):1491-1510. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14023. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Role of pitch in toddler looking to and referents in American English.音高在美国英语幼儿寻找和指代对象中的作用。
Lang Learn Dev. 2023;19(4):458-479. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2022.2149400. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
5
Approach-avoidance orientations can predict young children's decision-making.趋近-回避取向可以预测幼儿的决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0288799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288799. eCollection 2023.
6
What children with and without ASD see: Similar visual experiences with different pathways through parental attention strategies.患有和未患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童所看到的:通过父母的注意力策略,有着不同途径的相似视觉体验。
Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2022 Dec 8;7:23969415221137293. doi: 10.1177/23969415221137293. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
The infant's view redefines the problem of referential uncertainty in early word learning.婴儿的视角重新定义了早期词汇学习中所指不确定性的问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107019118.
8
Use of Mutual Exclusivity and its Relationship to Language Ability in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍幼儿中互斥性的使用及其与语言能力的关系。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Oct;52(10):4528-4539. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05321-0. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
Where's the Advantage? Mutual Exclusivity Promotes Children's Initial Mapping, but Not Long-Term Memory, for Words Compared to Other Strategies.优势何在?与其他策略相比,互斥性有助于儿童对单词进行初始映射,但对长期记忆并无帮助。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 9;12:686554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686554. eCollection 2021.
10
When slowing down processing helps learning: Lexico-semantic structure supports retention, but interferes with disambiguation of novel object-label mappings.当减缓处理速度有助于学习时:词汇语义结构支持保留,但会干扰新的物体-标签映射的歧义消除。
Dev Sci. 2020 Nov;23(6):e12963. doi: 10.1111/desc.12963. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants.24个月大婴儿的快速映射但记忆不佳。
Infancy. 2008 Mar 4;13(2):128-157. doi: 10.1080/15250000701795598. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
2
Can 18-Month-Old Infants Learn Words by Listening In on Conversations?18个月大的婴儿能通过偷听对话来学习单词吗?
Infancy. 2006 May;9(3):327-339. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0903_4. Epub 2006 May 1.
3
Understanding Interest in the Second Year of Life.
Infancy. 2010 May;15(3):324-335. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00011.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
4
A neurocomputational account of taxonomic responding and fast mapping in early word learning.神经计算学对早期词汇学习中分类反应和快速映射的解释
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):1-31. doi: 10.1037/a0018130.
5
Two-year-olds exclude novel objects as potential referents of novel words based on pragmatics.两岁儿童会根据语用学将新物体排除在新单词的潜在指代对象之外。
Cognition. 2009 Sep;112(3):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.010. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
6
Explaining the disambiguation effect: don't exclude mutual exclusivity.解释消歧效应:不要排除互斥性。
J Child Lang. 2010 Jan;37(1):95-113. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909009519. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
7
Children's use of mutual exclusivity to learn labels for parts of objects.儿童利用互斥性来学习物体各部分的标签。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;45(2):592-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014838.
8
Infants use shared experience to interpret pointing gestures.婴儿利用共同的经历来解读指示性手势。
Dev Sci. 2009 Mar;12(2):264-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00758.x.
9
Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagement.14个月大的婴儿只有在共同参与时才知道他人的经历。
Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):826-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00615.x.
10
Word learning as Bayesian inference.作为贝叶斯推理的词汇学习
Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):245-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245.