Deakin University, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Mar;14(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
Physical activity recommendations for children in several countries advise that all young people should accumulate at least 60 min of moderate to vigorous physical activity every day. Perceiving physical activity intensity, however, can be a difficult task for children and it is not clear whether children can identify their levels of moderate to vigorous physical activity in accordance with the recommended guidelines. This study aimed to (1) explore whether children can identify time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity; and (2) investigate whether heart rate biofeedback would improve children's ability to estimate time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity. Thirty seven children (15 boys and 22 girls, mean age 12.6 years) wore data recording Polar E600 heart rate monitors during eight physical education lessons. At the end of each lesson children's estimated time in zone was compared to their actual time in zone. During a six lesson Intervention phase, one class was assigned to a biofeedback group whilst the other class acted as the control group and received no heart rate biofeedback. Post-Intervention, students in the biofeedback group were no better than the control group at estimating time spent in zone (mean relative error of estimation biofeedback group: Pre-Intervention 41±32% to Post-Intervention 28±26%; control group: Pre-Intervention 40±39% to Post-Intervention 31±37%). Thus it seems that identifying time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity remains a complex task for children aged 11-13 even with the help of heart rate biofeedback.
一些国家的儿童身体活动建议指出,所有年轻人每天应至少积累 60 分钟的中等到剧烈身体活动。然而,感知身体活动强度对于儿童来说可能是一项艰巨的任务,并且不清楚儿童是否能够根据推荐指南识别他们的中等到剧烈身体活动水平。本研究旨在:(1) 探索儿童是否能够识别中等到剧烈身体活动所花费的时间;以及 (2) 研究心率生物反馈是否会提高儿童估计中等到剧烈身体活动时间的能力。37 名儿童(15 名男孩和 22 名女孩,平均年龄 12.6 岁)在 8 节体育课期间佩戴记录 Polar E600 心率监测器。在每节课结束时,将儿童的估计时间与实际时间进行比较。在 6 节干预阶段,一个班级被分配到生物反馈组,而另一个班级作为对照组,不接受心率生物反馈。干预后,生物反馈组的学生在估计时间方面并不比对照组好(生物反馈组的估计误差百分比:干预前 41±32%至干预后 28±26%;对照组:干预前 40±39%至干预后 31±37%)。因此,即使有心率生物反馈的帮助,11-13 岁的儿童识别中等到剧烈身体活动所花费的时间似乎仍然是一项复杂的任务。