Suppr超能文献

不同活动水平儿童的工作日和周末久坐时间及身体活动情况

Weekday and weekend sedentary time and physical activity in differentially active children.

作者信息

Fairclough Stuart J, Boddy Lynne M, Mackintosh Kelly A, Valencia-Peris Alexandra, Ramirez-Rico Elena

机构信息

The Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.

The Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jul;18(4):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether weekday-weekend differences in sedentary time and specific intensities of physical activity exist among children categorised by physical activity levels.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

METHODS

Seven-day accelerometer data were obtained from 810 English children (n=420 girls) aged 10-11 years. Daily average minday(-1) spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity were calculated for each child. Sex-specific moderate to vigorous physical activity quartile cut-off values categorised boys and girls separately into four graded groups representing the least (Q1) through to the most active (Q4) children. Sex- and activity quartile-specific multilevel linear regression analyses analysed differences in sedentary time, light physical activity, moderate physical activity, vigorous physical activity, and moderate to vigorous physical activity between weekdays and weekends.

RESULTS

On weekdays Q2 boys spent longer in light physical activity (p<0.05), Q1 (p<0.001), Q2 boys (p<0.01) did significantly more moderate physical activity, and Q1-Q3 boys accumulated significantly more vigorous physical activity and moderate to vigorous physical activity than at weekends. There were no significant differences in weekday and weekend sedentary time or physical activity for Q4 boys. On weekdays Q2 and Q3 girls accumulated more sedentary time (p<0.05), Q1 and Q2 girls did significantly more moderate physical activity (p<0.05), and Q1-Q3 girls engaged in more vigorous physical activity (p<0.05) and more moderate to vigorous physical activity (p<0.01) than at weekends. Q4 girls' sedentary time and physical activity varied little between weekdays and weekends.

CONCLUSIONS

The most active children maintained their sedentary time and physical activity levels at weekends, while among less active peers weekend sedentary time and physical activity at all intensities was lower. Low active children may benefit most from weekend intervention strategies.

摘要

目的

调查按身体活动水平分类的儿童在久坐时间和特定强度身体活动方面是否存在工作日与周末差异。

设计

横断面观察性研究。

方法

从810名10至11岁的英国儿童(n = 420名女孩)中获取了7天的加速度计数据。计算每个儿童每天平均花费在中度至剧烈身体活动上的分钟数。按性别划分的中度至剧烈身体活动四分位数临界值分别将男孩和女孩分为四个等级组,代表从最不活跃(Q1)到最活跃(Q4)的儿童。进行按性别和活动四分位数特定的多水平线性回归分析,以分析工作日和周末之间在久坐时间、轻度身体活动、中度身体活动、剧烈身体活动以及中度至剧烈身体活动方面的差异。

结果

在工作日,Q2组男孩在轻度身体活动上花费的时间更长(p < 0.05),Q1组(p < 0.001)、Q2组男孩(p < 0.01)进行的中度身体活动明显更多,并且Q1 - Q3组男孩积累的剧烈身体活动以及中度至剧烈身体活动比周末显著更多。Q4组男孩在工作日和周末的久坐时间或身体活动没有显著差异。在工作日,Q2组和Q3组女孩积累了更多的久坐时间(p < 0.05),Q1组和Q2组女孩进行的中度身体活动明显更多(p < 0.05),并且Q1 - Q3组女孩进行的剧烈身体活动更多(p < 0.05)以及中度至剧烈身体活动更多(p < 0.01),均高于周末。Q4组女孩的久坐时间和身体活动在工作日和周末之间变化不大。

结论

最活跃的儿童在周末保持其久坐时间和身体活动水平,而在不太活跃的同龄人中,周末的久坐时间和所有强度的身体活动都较低。低活跃度儿童可能从周末干预策略中获益最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验