Montgomery F, Persson U, Benoni G, Willner S, Lindgren B
Department of Orthopedics, Malmoe General Hospital, University of Lund, Sweden.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Feb;15(2):67-70. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199002000-00003.
The cost-effectiveness of three different screening methods was studied: the no specific screening, the conventional clinical screening, and the combined clinical moiré screening alternative. A multistage model of the treatment process was developed. Data from retrospective studies in Malmo were used. The costs for health care and production loss were calculated and applied to the time profiles of the three screening alternatives. Health care costs as well as costs in loss of production increased with the introduction of the conventional clinical screening program. However, when the clinical screening was combined with the moiré technique, the costs were markedly reduced. Thus, the combined clinical moiré screening would be the cost-effective way of using resources to prevent scolioses from developing into a more severe deformity.
无特定筛查、传统临床筛查以及临床与云纹筛查相结合的替代方法。开发了治疗过程的多阶段模型。使用了来自马尔默回顾性研究的数据。计算了医疗保健成本和生产损失成本，并将其应用于三种筛查替代方案的时间概况。随着传统临床筛查项目的引入，医疗保健成本以及生产损失成本都有所增加。然而，当临床筛查与云纹技术相结合时，成本显著降低。因此，临床与云纹筛查相结合将是利用资源预防脊柱侧弯发展为更严重畸形的具有成本效益的方式。
