Suppr超能文献

择期肺切除术后应用 PleuraSeal 控制漏气的前瞻性欧洲多中心随机试验。

Prospective European multicenter randomized trial of PleuraSeal for control of air leaks after elective pulmonary resection.

机构信息

University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Apr;141(4):881-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.019. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a synthetic bioresorbable pleural sealant (PleuraSeal; Covidien, Bedford, Mass) to treat air leaks after pulmonary resection.

METHODS

Patients with air leaks after lung resection were randomized to treatment with pleural sealant on air leak sites after standard methods of lung closure or standard lung closure only. The primary outcome variable was the percentage of patients remaining air leak free until discharge. The secondary outcome variables were the proportion of patients with successful intraoperative air leak sealing, time to last air leak, and durations of chest tube drainage and hospitalization.

RESULTS

The sealant group comprised 62 subjects, and the control group comprised 59 subjects. Most patients (98.3%) underwent open lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma. The overall success rates for intraoperative air leak sealing were as follows: sealant group, 71.0%; control group, 23.7% (P < .001). For grade 2 and 3 air leaks (n = 77), the intraoperative sealing rates were as follows: sealant group, 71.7%; control group, 9.1% (P < .001). More patients with grade 2 and 3 air leaks had their leaks remain sealed in the sealant group (43.5% vs 15.2%, P = .013). The median time from skin closure to last observable air leak was 6 hours (sealant group) versus 42 hours (control group, P = .718). No treatment-related complications were reported. No differences in drainage or hospitalization were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study the pleural sealant was safe and effective treatment for intraoperative air leaks after lung resection. Significantly fewer patients with surgically relevant intraoperative air leaks had postoperative air leaks when the pleural sealant was applied.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估一种合成生物可吸收胸膜密封剂(PleuraSeal;Covidien,马萨诸塞州贝德福德)治疗肺切除术后肺漏气的疗效和安全性。

方法

肺切除术后有肺漏气的患者被随机分为两组,一组在标准肺闭合后在漏气部位使用胸膜密封剂,另一组仅行标准肺闭合。主要观察变量为直至出院时无肺漏气的患者比例。次要观察变量为术中成功密封漏气的患者比例、最后一次漏气时间、胸腔引流管和住院时间。

结果

密封剂组有 62 例患者,对照组有 59 例患者。大多数患者(98.3%)因支气管肺癌而行开胸肺叶切除术。术中漏气密封的总体成功率如下:密封剂组为 71.0%,对照组为 23.7%(P<0.001)。对于 2 级和 3 级漏气(n=77),术中密封率如下:密封剂组为 71.7%,对照组为 9.1%(P<0.001)。更多 2 级和 3 级漏气患者的漏气在密封剂组中得到了密封(43.5%比 15.2%,P=0.013)。从皮肤闭合到最后观察到漏气的中位时间为 6 小时(密封剂组)与 42 小时(对照组,P=0.718)。未报告与治疗相关的并发症。未观察到引流或住院时间的差异。

结论

在这项多中心研究中,胸膜密封剂是治疗肺切除术后术中肺漏气的安全有效方法。与对照组相比,应用胸膜密封剂后,手术相关术中肺漏气患者术后肺漏气的发生率显著降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验