• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项减少物质使用的学校风气干预措施的多方法先导试验:构建预防的上游途径假设。

Pilot multimethod trial of a school-ethos intervention to reduce substance use: building hypotheses about upstream pathways to prevention.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2010 Dec;47(6):555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.011
PMID:21094432
Abstract

PURPOSE

Interventions to improve school ethos can reduce substance use but "upstream" causal pathways relating to implementation and school-level changes are uncertain. We use qualitative and quantitative data from a pilot trial to build hypotheses regarding these.

METHODS

The Healthy School Ethos intervention involved two schools being provided with facilitation, training, and funding to plan and implement actions (some mandatory and some locally determined) to improve school ethos over one year. The evaluation involved a pilot-trial with two intervention and two comparison schools; semi-structured interviews with facilitators, staff, and students; and baseline and follow-up surveys with students aged 11 to 12 years.

RESULTS

Student accounts linked participation in planning or delivering intervention activities with improved self-regard and relationships with staff and other students. Some activities such as re-writing school rules involved broad participation. Students in receipt of actions such as peer-mediation or motivational sessions reported benefits such as improved safety and relationships. Some student accounts linked improved self-regard and relationships with increased engagement and aspirations, and reduced substance use. At 9-month follow-up, students in intervention schools reported less hurting and teasing of others and feeling unsafe at school. Other outcomes suggested intervention benefits but were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

School-ethos interventions may reduce substance use through upstream pathways involving the aforementioned factors. Future phase-III trials should quantitatively model the extent to which these mediate intervention effects.

摘要

目的

改善学校风气的干预措施可以减少物质使用,但与实施和学校层面变化相关的“上游”因果途径尚不确定。我们利用一项试点试验的定性和定量数据来构建这些假设。

方法

健康学校风气干预措施为两所学校提供了促进、培训和资金,以规划和实施改善学校风气的行动(一些是强制性的,一些是由当地确定的),为期一年。该评估涉及一项试点试验,有两所干预学校和两所对照学校;与促进者、工作人员和学生进行半结构化访谈;以及对 11 至 12 岁学生进行基线和随访调查。

结果

学生的叙述将参与规划或实施干预活动与自我尊重的提高以及与工作人员和其他学生的关系联系起来。一些活动,如重写校规,涉及广泛的参与。接受同伴调解或激励课程等活动的学生报告说,他们受益于安全性和人际关系的改善。一些学生的叙述将自我尊重和人际关系的提高与参与度和愿望的增加以及物质使用的减少联系起来。在 9 个月的随访中,干预学校的学生报告说,他们对他人的伤害和嘲笑以及在学校感到不安全的情况减少了。其他结果表明干预有好处,但并不显著。

结论

学校风气干预措施可能通过涉及上述因素的“上游”途径减少物质使用。未来的第三阶段试验应定量模拟这些因素在多大程度上介导干预效果。

相似文献

1
Pilot multimethod trial of a school-ethos intervention to reduce substance use: building hypotheses about upstream pathways to prevention.一项减少物质使用的学校风气干预措施的多方法先导试验:构建预防的上游途径假设。
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Dec;47(6):555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
2
Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.通过学校环境在欺凌和攻击行为方面进行局部变革(包容性):一项试点随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(53):1-109, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19530.
3
Whole-school interventions promoting student commitment to school to prevent substance use and violence, and improve educational attainment: a systematic review.促进学生对学校的承诺以预防药物使用和暴力、提高教育程度的全校干预措施:系统评价。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;12(2):1-290. doi: 10.3310/DWTR3299.
4
Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a school-based peer-led anti-smoking intervention in the UK: the ASSIST cluster randomised trial [ISRCTN55572965].英国一项基于学校的同伴主导的戒烟干预综合评估的基本原理、设计与实施:ASSIST整群随机试验[ISRCTN55572965]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Apr 22;5:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-43.
5
A randomised controlled implementation trial of the feasibility and effectiveness of school staff delivery of a selective substance use and mental health program during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于学校工作人员在新冠疫情期间开展选择性物质使用和心理健康项目的可行性与有效性的随机对照实施试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21493-1.
6
A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a support and training intervention to improve the mental health of secondary school teachers and students - the WISE (Wellbeing in Secondary Education) study.一项支持与培训干预措施以改善中学教师和学生心理健康的整群随机对照试验——WISE(中学教育中的幸福感)研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3737-y.
7
Framework for Supporting Adolescent Peer Leaders: A Pilot Using Text Messaging in a School-Based Substance Use Prevention Program.支持青少年同伴领袖的框架:一项在基于学校的药物使用预防项目中使用短信的试点研究。
J Prim Prev. 2019 Apr;40(2):243-254. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00545-4.
8
Effectiveness of a pragmatic school-based universal resilience intervention in reducing tobacco, alcohol and illicit substance use in a population of adolescents: cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项基于学校的实用普遍抗逆力干预措施在减少青少年群体烟草、酒精和非法药物使用方面的效果:整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e016060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016060.
9
Does school ethos explain the relationship between value-added education and teenage substance use? A cohort study.学校风气是否能解释增值教育与青少年物质使用之间的关系?一项队列研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.045. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
10
Acceptability, feasibility, fidelity and quality implementation of the culturally adapted version of the Social Competence Promotion Program among Young Adolescents ("Mi Mejor Plan") to prevent substance use among adolescents in Chile: a pilot randomized control study.智利青少年社交能力促进计划(“我的最佳计划”)文化适应版在预防青少年药物使用方面的可接受性、可行性、保真度及质量实施:一项试点随机对照研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):1860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23033-3.

引用本文的文献

1
What factors influence implementation of whole-school interventions aiming to promote student commitment to school to prevent substance use and violence? Systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations.哪些因素影响旨在促进学生对学校的承诺以预防药物使用和暴力的全校干预措施的实施?系统评价和过程评估的综合分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):2148. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14544-4.
2
Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11-16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders' Experiences.共同生产作为一种新兴方法,用于开发面向 11-16 岁学生的基于学校的健康干预措施:干预类型、理论和过程的系统评价,以及利益相关者经验的主题综合。
Prev Sci. 2021 May;22(4):475-491. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
Broader impacts of an intervention to transform school environments on student behaviour and school functioning: post hoc analyses from the INCLUSIVE cluster randomised controlled trial.干预措施对学生行为和学校功能的广泛影响:来自 INCLUSIVE 集群随机对照试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 15;10(5):e031589. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031589.
4
Comprehensive approaches to addressing mental health needs and enhancing school security: a hybrid type II cluster randomized trial.满足心理健康需求和加强校园安全的综合方法:一项混合型II类整群随机试验
Health Justice. 2020 Jan 14;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40352-020-0104-y.
5
Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.针对年轻人多种风险行为的个人、家庭和学校层面的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 5;10(10):CD009927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.
6
The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example.在实用随机对照试验中构建和检验中层理论的三个阶段:一个理论与方法的案例
Trials. 2015 Oct 15;16:466. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y.
7
Replication of a whole school ethos-changing intervention: different context, similar effects, additional insights.一项改变全校风气干预措施的复制:不同背景、相似效果、更多见解。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 19;15:265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1538-3.
8
School social fragmentation, economic deprivation and social cohesion and adolescent physical inactivity: a longitudinal study.学校社会碎片化、经济剥夺与社会凝聚力及青少年身体活动不足:一项纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099154. eCollection 2014.
9
Does school ethos explain the relationship between value-added education and teenage substance use? A cohort study.学校风气是否能解释增值教育与青少年物质使用之间的关系?一项队列研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.045. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
10
Protocol for a systematic review of the effects of schools and school-environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and syntheses.系统评价学校和学校环境干预对健康影响的方案:证据绘图与综合。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 9;11:453. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-453.