• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项改变全校风气干预措施的复制:不同背景、相似效果、更多见解。

Replication of a whole school ethos-changing intervention: different context, similar effects, additional insights.

作者信息

Hawe Penelope, Bond Lyndal, Ghali Laura M, Perry Rosemary, Davison Colleen M, Casey David M, Butler Helen, Webster Cynthia M, Scholz Bert

机构信息

O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N6, Canada.

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre and Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 19;15:265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1538-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1538-3
PMID:25880841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4373008/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whole school, ethos-changing interventions reduce risk behaviours in middle adolescence, more than curriculum-based approaches. Effects on older ages are not known. We set out to replicate one of these interventions, Australia's Gatehouse Project, in a rural Canadian high school.

METHODS

A guided, whole school change process sought to make students feel more safe, connected, and valued by: changes in teaching practices, orientation processes, professional development of staff, recognition and reward mechanisms, elevating student voice, and strategies to involve greater proactivity and participation. We conducted risk behaviour surveys in grades 10 to 12 before the intervention and 2 years afterwards, and social network analyses with the staff. Changes in health and health risk behaviours were assessed using chi-square. Interactions between the intervention and gender and between the intervention and school engagement were assessed using interaction terms in logistic regression models. Changes in the density of relationships among staff were tested with methods analogous to paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Like Gatehouse, there was no statistically significant reduction in depressive symptoms or bullying, though the trend was in that direction. Among girls, there was a statistically significant decrease in low school engagement (45% relative reduction), and decreases in drinking (46% relative reduction), unprotected sex (61% relative reduction) and poor health (relative reduction of 73%). The reduction in drinking matched the national trend. Reductions in unprotected sex and poor health went against the national trend. We found no statistically significant changes for boys. The effects coincided with statistically significant increases in the densities of staff networks, indicating that part of the mechanism may be through relationships at school.

CONCLUSIONS

A non-specific, risk protective intervention in the social environment of the school had a significant impact on a cluster of risk behaviours for girls. Results were remarkably like reports from similar school environment interventions elsewhere, albeit with different behaviours being affected. It may be that this type of intervention activates change processes that interact highly with context, impacting different risks differently, according to the prevalence, salience and distribution of the risk and the interconnectivity of relationships between staff and students. This requires further exploration.

摘要

背景

与基于课程的方法相比,全校性的、改变风气的干预措施能更有效地减少青少年中期的危险行为。其对年龄较大学生的影响尚不清楚。我们着手在加拿大一所农村高中复制其中一项干预措施,即澳大利亚的盖特豪斯项目。

方法

一个有指导的全校变革过程旨在通过以下方式让学生感到更安全、更有归属感和更受重视:改变教学实践、迎新流程、教职工的专业发展、认可和奖励机制、提升学生的话语权,以及采取策略让学生更积极主动地参与。我们在干预前和干预后两年对10至12年级的学生进行了危险行为调查,并对教职工进行了社交网络分析。使用卡方检验评估健康和健康危险行为的变化。在逻辑回归模型中使用交互项评估干预与性别之间以及干预与学校参与度之间的相互作用。使用类似于配对t检验的方法测试教职工之间关系密度的变化。

结果

与盖特豪斯项目一样,抑郁症状或欺凌行为虽有下降趋势,但在统计学上没有显著降低。在女生中,学校参与度低(相对降低45%)、饮酒(相对降低46%)、无保护性行为(相对降低61%)和健康状况差(相对降低73%)在统计学上有显著下降。饮酒量的下降与全国趋势相符。无保护性行为和健康状况差的下降与全国趋势相反。我们发现男生没有统计学上的显著变化。这些影响与教职工网络密度的显著增加同时出现,表明部分机制可能是通过学校中的人际关系。

结论

在学校社会环境中进行的非特定的、风险保护干预对女生的一系列危险行为产生了重大影响。结果与其他地方类似学校环境干预的报告非常相似,尽管受影响的行为不同。可能是这种类型的干预激活了与背景高度相互作用的变革过程,根据风险的流行程度、显著性和分布以及教职工与学生之间关系的相互关联性,对不同风险产生不同影响。这需要进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c7/4373008/9d1bf98c5811/12889_2015_1538_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c7/4373008/c59ee2bdcb5e/12889_2015_1538_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c7/4373008/9d1bf98c5811/12889_2015_1538_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c7/4373008/c59ee2bdcb5e/12889_2015_1538_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c7/4373008/9d1bf98c5811/12889_2015_1538_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Replication of a whole school ethos-changing intervention: different context, similar effects, additional insights.一项改变全校风气干预措施的复制:不同背景、相似效果、更多见解。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 19;15:265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1538-3.
2
Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.通过学校环境在欺凌和攻击行为方面进行局部变革(包容性):一项试点随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(53):1-109, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19530.
3
Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.通过学校环境在欺凌和攻击行为方面进行本地变革(包容性):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Sep 30;15:381. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-381.
4
Evaluation of a culture change program to reduce unprofessional behaviours by hospital co-workers in Australian hospitals.评估一项文化变革计划,以减少澳大利亚医院同事的不专业行为。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11171-0.
5
Changing schools, changing health? Design and implementation of the Gatehouse Project.转学与健康变化?门楼项目的设计与实施
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Oct;33(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00204-0.
6
Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE) trial: update to cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.通过学校环境在欺凌和攻击行为方面进行本地变革(包容性)试验:群组随机对照试验方案更新
Trials. 2017 May 25;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1984-6.
7
8
Pilot multimethod trial of a school-ethos intervention to reduce substance use: building hypotheses about upstream pathways to prevention.一项减少物质使用的学校风气干预措施的多方法先导试验:构建预防的上游途径假设。
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Dec;47(6):555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
9
The Positive Choices trial: study protocol for a Phase-III RCT trial of a whole-school social marketing intervention to promote sexual health and reduce health inequalities.《积极选择试验》:一项针对全校范围社会营销干预措施的 III 期 RCT 试验的研究方案,旨在促进性健康和减少健康不平等。
Trials. 2021 Nov 17;22(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05793-6.
10
The Gatehouse Project: can a multilevel school intervention affect emotional wellbeing and health risk behaviours?门楼项目:多层次学校干预能否影响情绪健康和健康风险行为?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Dec;58(12):997-1003. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.009449.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned in Implementing Youth and Parent Participatory Action Research in a School-Based Intervention.在学校干预中实施青少年和家长参与式行动研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):15-36. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0002.
2
Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11-16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders' Experiences.共同生产作为一种新兴方法,用于开发面向 11-16 岁学生的基于学校的健康干预措施:干预类型、理论和过程的系统评价,以及利益相关者经验的主题综合。
Prev Sci. 2021 May;22(4):475-491. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trajectories of multiple adolescent health risk behaviors in a low-income African American population.低收入非裔美国人青少年多种健康风险行为的轨迹。
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov;25(4 Pt 1):1155-69. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000436.
2
Theories of how the school environment impacts on student health: systematic review and synthesis.学校环境影响学生健康的理论:系统评价与综合。
Health Place. 2013 Nov;24:242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
3
School-based programmes for preventing smoking.以学校为基础的预防吸烟计划。
Applying systems thinking to knowledge mobilisation in public health.
将系统思维应用于公共卫生领域的知识传播。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Nov 17;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00600-1.
4
From Complex Interventions to Complex Systems: Using Social Network Analysis to Understand School Engagement with Health and Wellbeing.从复杂干预到复杂系统:利用社会网络分析理解学校对健康和幸福的参与。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 14;16(10):1694. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101694.
5
Do the key functions of an intervention designed from the same specifications vary according to context? Investigating the transferability of a public health intervention in France.从相同规范设计的干预措施的关键功能是否会因环境而异?调查法国公共卫生干预措施的可转移性。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 2;14(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0880-8.
6
Teacher Rated School Ethos and Student Reported Bullying-A Multilevel Study of Upper Secondary Schools in Stockholm, Sweden.教师评价的学校风气与学生报告的欺凌行为——瑞典斯德哥尔摩高中的多层次研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 13;14(12):1565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121565.
7
Variations in schools' commitment to health and implementation of health improvement activities: a cross-sectional study of secondary schools in Wales.学校对健康的重视程度及健康改善活动实施情况的差异:威尔士中学的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 10;16:138. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2763-0.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD001293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.
4
The effects of the school environment on student health: a systematic review of multi-level studies.学校环境对学生健康的影响:一项多层次研究的系统评价。
Health Place. 2013 May;21:180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
5
School-based prevention programs for depression and anxiety in adolescence: a systematic review.青少年抑郁症和焦虑症的校本预防项目:一项系统综述。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Sep;29(3):427-41. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat001. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
6
The effect of the school environment on the emotional health of adolescents: a systematic review.学校环境对青少年情绪健康的影响:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):925-49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2248. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
7
An overview of prevention of multiple risk behaviour in adolescence and young adulthood.青少年和青年期多种危险行为预防概述。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34 Suppl 1:i31-40. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr113.
8
Interventions to prevent substance use and risky sexual behaviour in young people: a systematic review.干预措施预防青少年物质使用和危险性行为:系统评价。
Addiction. 2012 Apr;107(4):733-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03751.x. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
9
Longitudinal consequences of adolescent bullying perpetration and victimisation: a study of students in Victoria, Australia.青少年欺凌行为与受欺凌经历的长期后果:对澳大利亚维多利亚州学生的一项研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Apr;21(2):107-16. doi: 10.1002/cbm.802.
10
Pilot multimethod trial of a school-ethos intervention to reduce substance use: building hypotheses about upstream pathways to prevention.一项减少物质使用的学校风气干预措施的多方法先导试验:构建预防的上游途径假设。
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Dec;47(6):555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 20.