DECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK.
Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Prev Sci. 2021 May;22(4):475-491. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
Co-production affords an intervention's target population the opportunity to participate in intervention theory decision-making during the development process. This addresses the over-reliance on developing interventions through academic theories which can be devoid of contextual understanding and result in challenges to implementing school-based health programmes. There is an emergent empirical literature on co-producing school-based health interventions, but an understanding of appropriate theoretical types and processes and stakeholders' experiences is lacking. Through the conduct of a systematic review, this study seeks to understand the types and underlying theories and processes for co-production in school-based health interventions with students aged 11-16. A thematic synthesis explored stakeholders' experiences of the different types of co-production. A systematic search of five electronic bibliographic databases, citation tracking of included studies, and consultation with an expert international panel were employed. Of 27,433 unique papers, 30 papers representing 22 studies were retained to describe types, and 23 papers of 18 studies used to synthesise stakeholders' experiences. Three types were identified: external, individual-level, and system-level capacity-building. Whilst this review showed variability in co-production types, stakeholders involved and processes, shared functions were identified. Students', school staff, facilitators' and researchers' experiences in terms of acceptability, feasibility and undertaking decision-making are discussed. Recommendations for conceptualising and reporting co-production and process evaluations of co-produced school-based health interventions are highlighted.
共同生产为干预目标人群提供了在发展过程中参与干预理论决策的机会。这解决了过度依赖学术理论开发干预措施的问题,这些理论可能缺乏对背景的理解,并导致在实施基于学校的健康计划方面面临挑战。目前已经有关于共同生产基于学校的健康干预措施的新兴实证文献,但对于适当的理论类型和过程以及利益相关者的经验缺乏理解。通过进行系统评价,本研究旨在了解 11-16 岁学生的基于学校的健康干预措施中共同生产的类型、潜在理论和过程。通过主题综合分析探讨了利益相关者对不同类型共同生产的经验。对五个电子书目数据库进行了系统检索,对纳入研究进行了引文追踪,并咨询了一个国际专家小组。在 27433 篇独特的论文中,保留了 30 篇论文(代表 22 项研究)来描述类型,23 篇论文(代表 18 项研究)用于综合利益相关者的经验。确定了三种类型:外部、个人层面和系统层面的能力建设。虽然本综述显示了共同生产类型、利益相关者参与和过程的可变性,但也确定了共同的功能。讨论了学生、学校工作人员、促进者和研究人员在可接受性、可行性和决策方面的经验。强调了共同生产的概念化和报告以及共同生产的基于学校的健康干预措施的过程评估的建议。