Family and Community Health Division, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6096, United States.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 May;48(5):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
The Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) is a widely used assessment tool for measuring parental characteristics that affect parent-child bonds. The measure was developed for and has been most administered in Western populations. Psychometric analyses have yielded discrepant results as to whether the PBI is best represented by a two-factor model (care and overprotection) or a three-factor model (care, overprotection, and autonomy).
Little is known about how the PBI performs in Chinese samples, and there is limited data from Eastern populations as a whole. The purpose of this study is to: (1) explore the data and identify the underlying structural model that best fits the Chinese culture, and (2) to further compare the factor structure that emerges in a Chinese sample with that which has emerged in other Eastern cultures (i.e., Japanese) and Western countries.
The present study investigated the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the PBI among a sample (N=1417) of mothers of kindergarten children. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify the most adequate model.
Results supported a four-factor model that included an indifference factor (χ(2)/df<3.0; RMSEA<0.06; SRMR<0.08). Both the two-factor and three-factor models performed poorly (χ(2)/df>5.0; RMSEA>0.08; SRMR>1.0; CFI<0.90 for both). In this sample, use of a Chinese translated version of the PBI was successful. Support for the four-factor model is consistent with findings from previous studies of Eastern populations and discrepant from those among Western samples.
The indifference factor may reflect aspects of parenting specific to Eastern cultures, which tend to value group cohesion over individualization and independence. More research is needed to determine whether these findings are generalizable to all Eastern countries and whether aspects of Chinese culture (e.g., the single-child law) produce unique effects that may impact PBI administration in China.
父母教养方式问卷(PBI)是一种广泛用于评估影响亲子关系的父母特征的测量工具。该测量工具是专为西方人群开发的,并且主要在西方人群中使用。心理测量学分析得出的结果不一致,即 PBI 是最好用双因素模型(关爱和过度保护)还是三因素模型(关爱、过度保护和自主)来表示。
人们对 PBI 在中文样本中的表现知之甚少,而且整个东方人群的数据也有限。本研究的目的是:(1)探索数据并确定最适合中国文化的潜在结构模型,(2)进一步比较中文样本中出现的因素结构与其他东方文化(即日本)和西方国家出现的因素结构。
本研究使用幼儿园儿童母亲的样本(N=1417),调查了 PBI 的中文翻译的心理测量特性。验证性因素分析用于确定最合适的模型。
结果支持包括冷漠因素的四因素模型(χ(2)/df<3.0;RMSEA<0.06;SRMR<0.08)。双因素和三因素模型的表现都很差(χ(2)/df>5.0;RMSEA>0.08;SRMR>1.0;CFI<0.90,两者都是)。在这个样本中,使用中文翻译的 PBI 是成功的。对四因素模型的支持与先前对东方人群的研究结果一致,与西方样本的结果不一致。
冷漠因素可能反映了特定于东方文化的育儿方面,东方文化倾向于重视群体凝聚力而不是个性化和独立性。需要进一步研究以确定这些发现是否适用于所有东方国家,以及中国文化的哪些方面(例如,独生子女政策)是否会产生独特的影响,从而影响 PBI 在中国大陆的实施。