Wen Lan, Huang Yaqing, Liu Yang, Zhang Shuyue
Faculty of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China; South China Business College, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China.
Faculty of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Mar;253:104688. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104688. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
This study aimed to validate and assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese adaptation of the Strength-Based Parenting Questionnaire (SBPQ) for the first time. A sample of 1590 middle school students participated in this investigation. Both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a 13-item two-factor structure (Strength-Based Parenting Knowledge, SBP-K, and Strength-Based Parenting Use, SBP-U) fit the data well (χ2/df = 8.138, RMSEA = 0.076, CFI = 0.962, TLI = 0.953, SRMR = 0.037), consistent with the original two-factor model. Moreover, internal consistency and test-retest reliability for the total scale and two subscales were found to be within the adequate range. Furthermore, the scores of the SBPQ, SBPQ-K, and SBPQ-U showed significant positive correlations with strengths knowledge scale (SKS), strengths use scale (SUS), and parental autonomy support/parental emotional warmth subscale in s-EMBU-C (Short-Egna Minnenav Barndoms Uppfostran-Chinese), while displaying significant negative correlations with parental protection subscale. The results of the cross-group measurement invariance models revealed that the SBPQ met configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, and residual invariance in participants of different genders, family structures, and family locations. Notably, scores among males were significantly higher than those of females, and two-parent children had higher scores than single-parent and other children. The scores of urban, township, and rural children decreased successively, with rural students scoring significantly lower than their counterparts did. In conclusion, the modified Chinese version of the Strength-based Parenting Questionnaire (SBPQ) appears to be a valid and reliable measure that is appropriate for widespread use among Chinese adolescent populations.
本研究旨在首次验证并评估中文版基于优势的育儿问卷(SBPQ)的心理测量特性。1590名中学生参与了此次调查。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均表明,一个包含13个条目的两因素结构(基于优势的育儿知识,SBP-K,以及基于优势的育儿实践,SBP-U)与数据拟合良好(χ2/df = 8.138,RMSEA = 0.076,CFI = 0.962,TLI = 0.953,SRMR = 0.037),与原始的两因素模型一致。此外,总量表和两个子量表的内部一致性和重测信度均在适当范围内。此外,SBPQ、SBPQ-K和SBPQ-U的得分与优势知识量表(SKS)、优势运用量表(SUS)以及s-EMBU-C(简版父母教养方式问卷-中文版)中的父母自主支持/父母情感温暖子量表呈显著正相关,而与父母保护子量表呈显著负相关。跨组测量不变性模型的结果表明,SBPQ在不同性别、家庭结构和家庭所在地的参与者中满足构型不变性、度量不变性、标量不变性和残差不变性。值得注意的是,男性得分显著高于女性,双亲家庭的孩子得分高于单亲家庭及其他家庭的孩子。城市、乡镇和农村儿童的得分依次降低,农村学生得分显著低于其他地区的学生。总之,修订后的中文版基于优势的育儿问卷(SBPQ)似乎是一种有效且可靠的测量工具,适用于在中国青少年人群中广泛使用。