Appelmelk B J, Cohen J, Silva A, Verweij-van Vught A M, Brade H, Maaskant J J, Schouten W F, Mol O, Honing A, Thijs L G
Department of Medical Microbiology, Vuije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1990;256:319-30. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-5140-6_27.
We have shown here that despite the use of monoclonal antibodies with well-defined epitope-specificities, and despite testing them in the most simple animal model available (i.e., mixing of homologous LPS with Mab prior to injection), we are not yet able to explain why some of the antibodies were effective and others not. For some of the clones (e.g., clone 20), an even better definition of binding sites is currently taking place in an attempt to obtain this understanding. We also do not yet understand why clone 20 was not effective in the mucin model, while using much lower amounts of injected antibody, and much higher challenge doses, this Mab was effective against E. coli in the gentamicin-treated mouse model. Very clear is, however, that in order to be protective in the latter model, Mabs are not required to be specific for lipid A. In the future it will be essential to develop procedures which measure specific interaction between smooth LPS/bacteria and antibodies to the LPS core region. In addition, it will be of great help when the chemical structure of non-substituted, rough-form LPS, as occurring in smooth LPS preparations, would be defined. This applies also to O-substituted core molecules.
我们在此表明,尽管使用了具有明确表位特异性的单克隆抗体,并且尽管在可用的最简单动物模型中对它们进行了测试(即在注射前将同源脂多糖与单克隆抗体混合),但我们仍无法解释为何有些抗体有效而有些无效。对于某些克隆(例如克隆20),目前正在对结合位点进行更精确的定义,以期获得这种理解。我们也尚不明白为何克隆20在粘蛋白模型中无效,而在使用低得多的抗体注射量和高得多的攻击剂量时,该单克隆抗体在庆大霉素处理的小鼠模型中对大肠杆菌有效。然而,非常明确的是,为了在后一种模型中具有保护作用,单克隆抗体并不需要对脂质A具有特异性。未来,开发能够测量光滑脂多糖/细菌与脂多糖核心区域抗体之间特异性相互作用的程序至关重要。此外,如果能够确定光滑脂多糖制剂中存在的未取代粗糙型脂多糖的化学结构,将非常有帮助。这也适用于O-取代的核心分子。