Burse V W, Groce D F, Korver M P, McClure P C, Head S L, Needham L L, Lapeza C R, Smrek A L
Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
Analyst. 1990 Mar;115(3):243-51. doi: 10.1039/an9901500243.
Serum for reference pools of in vivo polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) was obtained from four goats that had received one dose (100 mg kg-1) of a selected technical Aroclor (AR) (1016, 1242, 1254 or 1260) and were allowed to recover for 30 d. These pools were used to assess the differences in an analytical method that determines and quantifies PCBs using packed-column gas chromatography (PCGC) (quantified on the basis of mean mass percent. data for grouped PCB peaks) and capillary-column gas chromatography (CCGC) (quantified on the basis of percent. composition data for specific congeners). With CCGC, results were statistically significantly different (p less than or equal to 0.0002) from results with PCGC for ARs 1016, 1242 and 1254 but not for AR 1260 (p = 0.23). When comparing these gas chromatographic methods using bovine serum spiked in vitro with the same ARs at 17-25 p.p.b., it was found that the methods were not statistically significantly different for any of the ARs (p = 0.30-0.92). Levels of serum PCB determined by the two methods for 12 persons, divided into two groups according to exposure, were compared using the paired t-test. Group 1 consisted of three persons with dietary and/or environmental exposure; one with dietary and/or environmental exposure in addition to occupational exposure dating back 20 years. Group 2 consisted of eight persons with recent occupational exposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
用于体内多氯联苯(PCBs)参考样本库的血清取自四只山羊,这些山羊接受了一剂(100毫克/千克)选定的工业用多氯联苯混合物(Aroclor,简称AR)(1016、1242、1254或1260),并在给药后恢复30天。这些样本库用于评估一种分析方法的差异,该方法使用填充柱气相色谱法(PCGC)(基于分组PCB峰的平均质量百分比数据进行定量)和毛细管柱气相色谱法(CCGC)(基于特定同系物的组成百分比数据进行定量)来测定和定量PCBs。对于AR 1016、1242和1254,CCGC的结果与PCGC的结果在统计学上有显著差异(p≤0.0002),但对于AR 1260则无显著差异(p = 0.23)。当使用添加了相同浓度(17 - 25 ppb)的上述ARs的牛血清在体外比较这些气相色谱方法时,发现对于任何一种ARs,两种方法在统计学上均无显著差异(p = 0.30 - 0.92)。使用配对t检验比较了通过这两种方法测定的12个人的血清PCB水平,这些人根据暴露情况分为两组。第1组由3名有饮食和/或环境暴露的人组成;1名除饮食和/或环境暴露外还有可追溯到20年前的职业暴露。第2组由8名近期有职业暴露的人组成。(摘要截断于250字)