• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将正在接受治疗的患者纳入美国食品药品监督管理局上市前批准的心血管器械研究。

Inclusion of training patients in US Food and Drug Administration premarket approval cardiovascular device studies.

作者信息

Chen Connie E, Dhruva Sanket S, Bero Lisa A, Redberg Rita F

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0124, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):534-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.445. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.445
PMID:21098342
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training patients are the first individuals in whom a physician uses an investigational device. There is great variability in the use of data from training patients in the absence of guidelines. The prevalence and extent of data reporting from training patients in cardiovascular device studies submitted for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval has not been characterized.

METHODS

Information on training patients was abstracted from the Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data summarizing cardiovascular device premarket applications approved by the FDA from 2000 through 2007. We examined the numbers and characteristics of training patients and the inclusion of their results in end-point analyses.

RESULTS

There were 78 cardiovascular device summaries in this 8-year period, of which 17 (22%) involved training patients. Of the 123 studies in the summaries, 20 (16%) used training patients. All studies excluded training patients from efficacy analyses and 19 of 20 (95%) excluded them from safety analyses. Sixteen of 20 (80%) did not provide any outcome data, and 15 of 20 (75%) did not check for outcome differences between training and nontraining treatment patients. Eighteen of 20 (90%) did not provide demographic information on training patients, and 14 of 20 (70%) did not prespecify guidelines for their enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Training patients comprise a considerable proportion of patients receiving investigational cardiovascular devices, but their results are excluded from FDA submissions. Their exclusion from analyses means that safety and efficacy outcomes may look better than actual results. Guidelines on the use and inclusion of results for training patients would improve accuracy on results reporting.

摘要

背景

试验患者是医生首次使用研究性器械的对象。在缺乏指南的情况下,试验患者数据的使用存在很大差异。提交给美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的心血管器械研究中,试验患者数据报告的普遍性和程度尚未得到描述。

方法

从2000年至2007年FDA批准的心血管器械上市前申请的安全性和有效性数据摘要中提取试验患者的信息。我们检查了试验患者的数量和特征,以及他们的结果是否纳入终点分析。

结果

在这8年期间有78份心血管器械摘要,其中17份(22%)涉及试验患者。在这些摘要中的123项研究中,20项(16%)使用了试验患者。所有研究都将试验患者排除在疗效分析之外,20项研究中有19项(95%)将他们排除在安全性分析之外。20项研究中有16项(80%)未提供任何结局数据,20项研究中有15项(75%)未检查试验患者与非试验患者治疗结局的差异。20项研究中有18项(90%)未提供试验患者的人口统计学信息,20项研究中有14项(70%)未预先指定其入选标准。

结论

试验患者占接受研究性心血管器械治疗患者的相当比例,但他们的结果被排除在FDA申报材料之外。将他们排除在分析之外意味着安全性和有效性结局可能看起来比实际结果更好。关于试验患者数据使用和结果纳入的指南将提高结果报告的准确性。

相似文献

1
Inclusion of training patients in US Food and Drug Administration premarket approval cardiovascular device studies.将正在接受治疗的患者纳入美国食品药品监督管理局上市前批准的心血管器械研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):534-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.445. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
2
Premarket clinical evaluation of novel cardiovascular devices: quality analysis of premarket clinical studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration 2000-2007.2000-2007 年向美国食品药品监督管理局提交的新型心血管设备上市前临床研究的质量分析:新型心血管设备上市前临床评估。
Am J Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):2-7. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181ca8105.
3
First in the US: can early cardiovascular device evaluation be revived in the US?美国首例:美国能否恢复早期心血管设备评估?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;12(4):195-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.06.003.
4
Medical devices; exemptions from premarket notification and reserved devices; class I--FDA. Notice.医疗器械;免于上市前通知和保留器械;I类——美国食品药品监督管理局。通知。
Fed Regist. 1998 Feb 2;63(21):5387-93.
5
Gastroenterology and urology devices; effective date of requirement for premarket approval of the implanted mechanical/hydraulic urinary continence device. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule.胃肠病学和泌尿学器械;植入式机械/液压尿失禁器械上市前批准要求的生效日期。美国卫生与公众服务部食品药品监督管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2000 Sep 26;65(187):57726-32.
6
Medtronic, Inc.; premarket approval of the Interstim Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) System--FDA. Notice.美敦力公司;Interstim骶神经刺激(SNS)系统的上市前批准——美国食品药品监督管理局。通知。
Fed Regist. 1998 Jan 29;63(19):4457.
7
Technology transfer of neuroprosthetic devices.神经假体装置的技术转让
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996 Apr;33(2):173-83.
8
Lessons learned from independent central review.独立中央审查的经验教训。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.031.
9
Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports.高风险心血管设备试验中的选择性报告:上市前批准摘要与已发表报告的横断面比较
BMJ. 2015 Jun 10;350:h2613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2613.
10
Cardiovascular, orthopedic, and physical medicine diagnostic devices; reclassification of cardiopulmonary bypass accessory equipment, goniometer device, and electrode cable devices. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule.心血管、骨科和物理医学诊断设备;体外循环辅助设备、测角仪设备和电极电缆设备的重新分类。美国卫生与公众服务部食品药品管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2000 Apr 11;65(70):19317-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving medical device regulation: the United States and Europe in perspective.改进医疗器械监管:美国和欧洲的视角。
Milbank Q. 2014 Mar;92(1):114-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12043.
2
FDA regulation of cardiovascular devices and opportunities for improvement.美国食品药品监督管理局对心血管器械的监管及改进机遇。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;36(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9767-1. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
How does medical device regulation perform in the United States and the European union? A systematic review.
美国和欧盟的医疗器械监管表现如何?一项系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001276. Epub 2012 Jul 31.