Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, NJ, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;44(12):1933-45. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P372. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
To provide an overview of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), as well as its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical evidence regarding its pharmacologic management.
Peer-reviewed articles were identified from MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Current Contents (all 1966-August 2010) using the search terms heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, diastolic heart failure, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), digoxin, β-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and vasodilators. Citations from available articles were also reviewed for additional references.
Fourteen published manuscripts relating to pharmacologic management of HFPEF were identified.
The prevalence of HFPEF has continued to increase. Compared to heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, HFPEF has been largely understudied. Unlike in the management of heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, β-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists did not demonstrate mortality benefit in HFPEF, with the exception of one small study evaluating the use of propranolol. However, this study enrolled a small number of patients with recent history of myocardial infarction, which limited the generalizability of the results. Most of the current evidence centers on morbidity benefits and symptom reduction. One study showed that treatment with candesartan reduced hospital admissions in this population of patients. Management of HFPEF still focuses on optimally managing underlying diseases (eg, hypertension).
Much remains to be learned about the appropriate pharmacologic management of patients with HFPEF. Hypertension is in most cases the predominant contributor to its development and progression. For this reason, antihypertensive treatment, including ACE inhibitors, ARBs, β-blockers, and calcium-channel blockers, has been evaluated and is recommended to control the disease in this patient population, although these agents have not demonstrated significant benefit beyond blood pressure control. Further research into the pathophysiology of HFPEF may contribute to identifying the most optimal agent in managing this disease.
概述射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFPEF),以及其病理生理学、诊断和临床证据,包括其药物治疗管理。
从 MEDLINE、国际药学文摘和当前内容(均为 1966 年 8 月至 2010 年 8 月)中使用搜索词“射血分数保留的心力衰竭”、“舒张功能障碍”、“舒张性心力衰竭”、“血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂”、“血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)”、“地高辛”、“β受体阻滞剂”、“钙通道阻滞剂”和“血管扩张剂”来确定同行评审文章。还查阅了现有文章的引文,以获取其他参考文献。
确定了 14 篇关于 HFPEF 药物治疗管理的已发表论文。
HFPEF 的患病率继续增加。与左心室收缩功能障碍性心力衰竭相比,HFPEF 研究相对较少。与左心室收缩功能障碍性心力衰竭的管理不同,ACE 抑制剂、ARB、β受体阻滞剂和醛固酮拮抗剂除了一项评估普萘洛尔使用的小型研究外,并未显示出死亡率获益,该研究纳入了少数近期心肌梗死病史的患者,这限制了研究结果的普遍性。目前的大部分证据集中在发病率获益和症状缓解上。一项研究表明,坎地沙坦治疗可减少该人群患者的住院人数。HFPEF 的管理仍侧重于优化治疗潜在疾病(如高血压)。
HFPEF 患者的适当药物治疗管理仍有许多未知之处。高血压是其发展和进展的主要原因。因此,评估了包括 ACE 抑制剂、ARB、β受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂在内的抗高血压治疗,并建议将其用于控制该患者人群的疾病,尽管这些药物除了控制血压之外,并没有显示出显著的益处。对 HFPEF 的病理生理学的进一步研究可能有助于确定管理这种疾病的最佳药物。