• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Isometric strength assessment, Part II: Static testing does not accurately classify validity of effort.

作者信息

Townsend Robert, Schapmire Darrell W, St James James, Feeler Larry

机构信息

WCS Occupational Rehabilitation Sports Medicine, Naperville, IL, USA.

出版信息

Work. 2010;37(4):387-94. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1092.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-2010-1092
PMID:21099013
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if these two commonly-administered isometric tests are accurate indices of effort.

PARTICIPANTS

34 healthy subjects were tested once giving a maximum voluntary effort and once attempting to feign weakness of 50% of maximum.

RESULTS

During feigned weakness sessions, 20 of 34 subjects (58.5%), produced CVs of 15% or less during the Leg Lift. At the 95% CI, the expected frequency of false negatives for feigned weakness is 42.3 to 75.3% for the Leg Lift. At the 95% CI, the expected frequency of false negatives for feigned weakness is 51.9% to 83.3% for the Arm Lift.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither isometric lift is appropriate for classifying validity of effort. Use of these isometric lifts should be discontinued for the assessment of effort.

摘要

相似文献

1
Isometric strength assessment, Part II: Static testing does not accurately classify validity of effort.
Work. 2010;37(4):387-94. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1092.
2
Isometric strength assessment, part I: static testing does not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity.等长肌力评估,第一部分:静态测试不能准确预测动态举重能力。
Work. 2010;37(3):301-8. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1082.
3
The concurrent validity of a hand-held versus a stationary dynamometer in testing isometric shoulder strength.手持式测力计与固定式测力计在测试等长肩部力量时的同时效度。
J Hand Ther. 2009 Oct-Dec;22(4):320-6; quiz 327. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
4
Differences in isometric neck muscle strength between healthy controls and women with chronic neck pain: the use of a reliable measurement.健康对照组与慢性颈痛女性之间等长颈部肌肉力量的差异:采用可靠的测量方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.776.
5
[Perceived exertion during simulated static work].[模拟静态工作期间的主观用力感觉]
Z Gesamte Hyg. 1991 Jan;37(1):26-9.
6
Simultaneous bilateral hand strength testing in a client population, Part II: Relationship to a distraction-based lifting evaluation.在客户群体中进行双侧同时手部力量测试,第二部分:与基于分心的提举评估的关系。
Work. 2010;37(4):395-403. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1093.
7
Reliability of a new instrument for measuring plantarflexor muscle strength.一种用于测量跖屈肌肌力的新仪器的可靠性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;88(9):1164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.028.
8
Lower extremity muscle strength in 6- to 8-year-old children using hand-held dynamometry.使用手持测力计评估6至8岁儿童的下肢肌肉力量。
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008 Summer;20(2):128-36. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e318172432d.
9
Effect of single and multi-joint lower extremity muscle strength on the functional capacity and ADL/IADL status in Japanese community-dwelling older adults.单关节和多关节下肢肌肉力量对日本社区老年人功能能力及日常生活活动/工具性日常生活活动状况的影响。
Nurs Health Sci. 2007 Sep;9(3):168-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00317.x.
10
The reliability of hand-held dynamometry in measuring isometric strength of the shoulder internal and external rotator musculature using a stabilization device.使用稳定装置时,手持测力计测量肩部内旋和外旋肌肉组织等长肌力的可靠性。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/09593980701213032.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making Data: Expectations for Reproducibility of Lifting on Separate Days.决策数据:关于在不同日期进行举重训练可重复性的期望。
Prof Case Manag. 2018 Jul/Aug;23(4):204-212. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000280.