• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作残疾评估中的变异来源。

Sources of variation in work disability assessment.

作者信息

Spanjer J, Krol B, Brouwer S, Groothoff J W

机构信息

Social Security Office, Assen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Work. 2010;37(4):405-11. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1094.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-2010-1094
PMID:21099015
Abstract

The assessment of work disability due to health problems is a difficult task because there is no straightforward relationship between disease and disability. As a result, there is wide inter-rater variability between physicians in assessing work disability. The aim of this paper is to discuss the sources of the inter-rater variability and to describe possibilities for its reduction. A model is presented in which the process of disability assessment, the instruments used and the role of the assessor is addressed. On the basis of this model, the causes of inter-rater variability and suggestions for improvement are discussed.

摘要

评估因健康问题导致的工作残疾是一项艰巨的任务,因为疾病与残疾之间不存在直接的关联。因此,医生在评估工作残疾时,评分者之间存在很大的差异。本文旨在探讨评分者之间差异的来源,并描述减少这种差异的可能性。文中提出了一个模型,该模型涉及残疾评估过程、所使用的工具以及评估者的角色。基于此模型,讨论了评分者之间差异的原因及改进建议。

相似文献

1
Sources of variation in work disability assessment.工作残疾评估中的变异来源。
Work. 2010;37(4):405-11. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1094.
2
Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.助产士对产时胎心监护图的视觉解读:观察者内部及观察者间的一致性
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(2):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03575.x.
3
Inter-rater reliability in disability assessment based on a semi-structured interview report.基于半结构化访谈报告的残疾评估中评估者间的可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(24):1885-90. doi: 10.1080/09638280701688185.
4
[Determining the quality of rater judgements using intraclass correlation, and enhancing rater judgements].[使用组内相关性确定评分者判断的质量,并增强评分者判断]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Dec;43(6):384-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814935.
5
Agreement between medical expert assessments in social medicine.医学专家在社会医学中的评估一致性。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Nov;39(7):766-72. doi: 10.1177/1403494811418282. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
6
Activity-based assessment (BIA)--inter-rater reliability and staff experiences.基于活动的评估(BIA)——评分者间信度及工作人员的体验。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2008 Jun;15(2):75-81. doi: 10.1080/11038120701526518.
7
Structuring the documentation of nursing care on the basis of a theoretical process model.基于理论流程模型构建护理记录。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Jun;18(2):229-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00274.x.
8
Digital output volumetric pulmonary artery catheters eliminate interoperator interpretation variability and improve consistency of treatment decisions.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Feb;204(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.008.
9
Measuring quality of patient information documents with an expanded EQIP scale.使用扩展的EQIP量表测量患者信息文件的质量。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
10
Documenting an EBP project: guidelines for what to include and why.记录循证实践项目:关于应包含内容及原因的指南。
J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 2009;40(2):12-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of specialized medical examinations in disability assessment: A cross-sectional study.残疾评估中专业医学检查的评估:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42439. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042439.
2
Inability to Work Fulltime and the Association with Paid Employment One Year After the Work Disability Assessment: A Longitudinal Register-Based Cohort Study.工作能力丧失评估一年后无法全职工作及其与带薪就业的关联:一项基于纵向登记的队列研究
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jun;35(2):390-399. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10212-z. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Reliability of CT Angiography in Cerebral Vasospasm: A Systematic Review of the Literature and an Inter- and Intraobserver Study.
CT 血管造影在脑血管痉挛中的可靠性:文献系统评价和观察者间及观察者内研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):612-618. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6462. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
The reproducibility of psychiatric evaluations of work disability: two reliability and agreement studies.精神科评估工作残疾的可重复性:两项可靠性和一致性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2171-y.
5
Sarcoidosis and Work Participation: The Need to Develop a Disease-Specific Core Set for Assessment of Work Ability.结节病与工作参与:制定用于评估工作能力的疾病特异性核心评估工具的必要性。
Lung. 2019 Aug;197(4):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00234-3. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts.法律专家如何处理医学报告和法医证据?瑞士法官及其他法律专家的经验、看法和叙述
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 13;10:18. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00018. eCollection 2019.
7
Assessment of prognosis by physicians involved in work disability evaluation: A qualitative study.医生对工作能力丧失评估中预后的评估:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 8;14(2):e0212276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212276. eCollection 2019.
8
Online Survey of Medical and Psychological Professionals on Structured Instruments for the Assessment of Work Ability in Psychiatric Patients.针对精神科患者工作能力评估结构化工具的医学与心理学专业人员在线调查
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 25;9:453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00453. eCollection 2018.
9
Inter-rater agreement in evaluation of disability: systematic review of reproducibility studies.残疾评估中的评分者间一致性:再现性研究的系统评价
BMJ. 2017 Jan 25;356:j14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j14.
10
Work disabilities and unmet needs for health care and rehabilitation among jobseekers: a community-level investigation using multidimensional work ability assessments.求职者中的工作残疾以及未满足的医疗保健和康复需求:一项使用多维工作能力评估的社区层面调查。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):343-351. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248632. Epub 2016 Nov 2.