Suppr超能文献

低收入城市居民针对解决健康问题的社会经济决定因素的干预措施的优先事项。

Priorities of low-income urban residents for interventions to address the socio-economic determinants of health.

作者信息

Danis Marion, Kotwani Namrata, Garrett Joanne, Rivera Ivonne, Davies-Cole John, Carter-Nolan Pamela

机构信息

Bioethics Consultation Service, Dept. of Bioethics; Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Rm. 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Nov;21(4):1318-39. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0929.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the priorities of low-income urban residents for interventions that address the socio-economic determinants of health.

METHODS

We selected and estimated the cost of 16 interventions related to education, housing, nutrition, employment, health care, healthy behavior, neighborhood improvement, and transportation. Low-income residents of Washington, D.C. (N=431) participated in decision exercises to prioritize these interventions.

RESULTS

Given a budget valued at approximately twice an estimated cost of medical and dental care ($885), the interventions ultimately prioritized by the greatest percentage of individuals were: health insurance (95%), housing vouchers (82%) dental care (82%), job training (72%), adult education (63%), counseling (68%), healthy behavior incentives (68%), and job placement (67%). The percentages of respondents who received support for housing, adult education, and job training and placement were far less than the percentage who prioritized these interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor and low-income residents' priorities may usefully inform allocation of social services that affect health.

摘要

目标

确定城市低收入居民对于解决健康问题的社会经济决定因素的干预措施的优先次序。

方法

我们挑选并估算了16项与教育、住房、营养、就业、医疗保健、健康行为、社区改善及交通相关的干预措施的成本。华盛顿特区的低收入居民(N = 431)参与了决策活动,以确定这些干预措施的优先次序。

结果

在一项价值约为医疗和牙科保健估计成本两倍(885美元)的预算下,最终被最大比例的个人列为优先事项的干预措施为:医疗保险(95%)、住房券(82%)、牙科保健(82%)、职业培训(72%)、成人教育(63%)、咨询(68%)、健康行为激励措施(68%)及就业安置(67%)。在住房、成人教育以及职业培训和安置方面获得支持的受访者比例远低于将这些干预措施列为优先事项的受访者比例。

结论

贫困和低收入居民的优先事项可能有助于为影响健康的社会服务分配提供参考。

相似文献

1
Priorities of low-income urban residents for interventions to address the socio-economic determinants of health.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Nov;21(4):1318-39. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0929.
2
Deliberation to enhance awareness of and prioritize socioeconomic interventions for health.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(5):789-97. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
3
Low-income employees' choices regarding employment benefits aimed at improving the socioeconomic determinants of health.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1650-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.091033. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
8
Fighting poverty: the economic adjustment of female migrants in Dhaka.
Environ Urban. 1995 Oct;7(2):51-65. doi: 10.1177/095624789500700211.
9
The relationship between poverty and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia: a district analysis.
Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr. 1989;80(5):284-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.1989.tb01908.x.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
A Social Media Study on Demographic Differences in Perceived Job Satisfaction.
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5(CSCW1). doi: 10.1145/3449241. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community.
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1279-1291. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab005.
3
CHAT SA: Modification of a Public Engagement Tool for Priority Setting for a South African Rural Context.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):197-209. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.110.
4
Clinical trial recruitment of adult African American smokers from economically disadvantaged urban communities.
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2020 Jan-Mar;19(1):133-150. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2018.1489746. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
5
Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Aug 1;7(8):746-754. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.15.
6
Social support, psychological vulnerability, and HIV risk among African American men who have sex with men.
Psychol Health. 2016 May;31(5):549-64. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1120301. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
7
Translating Life Course Theory to clinical practice to address health disparities.
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Feb;18(2):389-95. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1279-9.
8
Deliberation to enhance awareness of and prioritize socioeconomic interventions for health.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Mar;72(5):789-97. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The health impacts of housing improvement: a systematic review of intervention studies from 1887 to 2007.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S681-92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.143909.
4
The health impact of supportive housing for HIV-positive homeless patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S675-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.137810. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
6
Closing the grocery gap in underserved communities: the creation of the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Financing Initiative.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):272-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000316486.57512.bf.
7
Low-income employees' choices regarding employment benefits aimed at improving the socioeconomic determinants of health.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1650-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.091033. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
9
Choosing Healthplans All Together: a deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Aug;30(4):563-601. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-4-563.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验