Department of General Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Gerontology. 2011;57(5):414-21. doi: 10.1159/000319422. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
To determine the prevalence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders, to define factors associated with CPR/DNAR orders and to explore how physicians make and document these decisions.
We prospectively reviewed CPR/DNAR forms of 1,446 patients admitted to the General Internal Medicine Department of the Geneva University Hospitals, a tertiary-care teaching hospital in Switzerland. We additionally administered a face-to-face survey to residents in charge of 206 patients including DNAR and CPR orders, with or without patient inclusion.
21.2% of the patients had a DNAR order, 61.7% a CPR order and 17.1% had neither. The two main factors associated with DNAR orders were a worse prognosis and/or a worse quality of life. Others factors were an older age, cancer and psychiatric diagnoses, and the absence of decision-making capacity. Residents gave four major justifications for DNAR orders: important comorbid conditions (34%), the patients' or their family's resuscitation preferences (18%), the patients' age (14.2%), and the absence of decision-making capacity (8%). Residents who wrote DNAR orders were more experienced. In many of the DNAR or CPR forms (19.8 and 16%, respectively), the order was written using a variety of formulations. For 24% of the residents, the distinction between the resuscitation order and the care objective was not clear. 38% of the residents found the resuscitation form useful.
Patients' prognosis and quality of life were the two main independent factors associated with CPR/DNAR orders. However, in the majority of cases, residents evaluated prognosis only intuitively, and quality of life without involving the patients. The distinction between CPR/DNAR orders and the care objectives was not always clear. Specific training regarding CPR/DNAR orders is necessary to improve the CPR/DNAR decision process used by physicians.
确定心肺复苏术(CPR)和不尝试复苏术(DNAR)医嘱的流行率,确定与 CPR/DNAR 医嘱相关的因素,并探讨医生如何做出和记录这些决定。
我们前瞻性地审查了瑞士日内瓦大学医院综合内科收治的 1446 名患者的 CPR/DNAR 表格,该医院是一家三级保健教学医院。我们还对负责 206 名患者(包括有或没有患者参与的 DNAR 和 CPR 医嘱)的住院医师进行了面对面调查。
21.2%的患者有 DNAR 医嘱,61.7%的患者有 CPR 医嘱,17.1%的患者两者都没有。与 DNAR 医嘱相关的两个主要因素是预后较差和/或生活质量较差。其他因素包括年龄较大、癌症和精神科诊断以及决策能力丧失。住院医师提出了四个主要的 DNAR 医嘱理由:重要合并症(34%)、患者或其家属的复苏偏好(18%)、患者年龄(14.2%)以及决策能力丧失(8%)。写 DNAR 医嘱的住院医师经验更丰富。在许多 DNAR 或 CPR 表格中(分别为 19.8%和 16%),医嘱的书写采用了多种表述方式。对于 24%的住院医师来说,复苏医嘱和护理目标之间的区别并不明确。38%的住院医师认为复苏表格有用。
患者的预后和生活质量是与 CPR/DNAR 医嘱相关的两个主要独立因素。然而,在大多数情况下,住院医师仅凭直觉评估预后,而不考虑患者的生活质量。CPR/DNAR 医嘱和护理目标之间的区别并不总是明确的。需要对 CPR/DNAR 医嘱进行专门培训,以改善医生使用的 CPR/DNAR 决策过程。