Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jan;68(1):198-205; discussion 205. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fe2db6.
ShuntCheck (Neuro Diagnostic Devices, Inc., Trevose, Pennsylvania) is a new device designed to detect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in a shunt by sensing skin temperature downstream from a region of CSF cooled by an ice cube.
To understand its accuracy and utility, we evaluated the use of this device during routine office visits as well as during workup for suspected shunt malfunction.
One hundred shunted patients were tested, including 48 evaluated during possible shunt malfunction, of whom 24 went on to surgical exploration. Digitally recorded data were blindly analyzed and compared with surgical findings and clinical follow-up.
Findings in the 20 malfunctioning shunts with unambiguous flow or absence of flow at surgery were strongly correlated with ShuntCheck results (sensitivity and specificity to flow of 80% and 100%, respectively, P = .0007, Fisher's exact test, measure of agreement κ = 0.8). However, the thermal determination did not distinguish patients in the suspected malfunction group who received surgery from those who were discharged without surgery (P = .248 by Fisher's exact test, κ = 0.20). Half of the patients seen in routine office visits did not have detectable flow, although none required shunt revision on clinical grounds. Intermittent flow was specifically demonstrated in one subject who had multiple flow determinations.
Operative findings show that the technique is sensitive and specific for detecting flow, but failure to detect flow does not statistically predict the need for surgery. A better understanding of the normal dynamics of flow in individual patients, which this device may yield, will be necessary before the true clinical utility of non-invasive flow measurement can be assessed.
ShuntCheck(宾夕法尼亚州特雷弗斯的神经诊断设备公司)是一种新设备,旨在通过感应冰块冷却的脑脊液区域下游皮肤温度来检测分流器中的脑脊液(CSF)流动。
为了了解其准确性和实用性,我们在常规就诊期间以及在疑似分流器故障的检查期间评估了该设备的使用情况。
对 100 例分流患者进行了测试,其中 48 例在疑似分流故障时进行了评估,其中 24 例进行了手术探查。对记录的数字数据进行了盲法分析,并与手术发现和临床随访进行了比较。
在手术时明确有或无分流的 20 例故障分流中,发现与 ShuntCheck 结果强烈相关(对分流的敏感性和特异性分别为 80%和 100%,P =.0007,Fisher 精确检验,一致性测量κ= 0.8)。然而,热测定并不能区分接受手术和未接受手术的疑似故障组患者(Fisher 精确检验 P =.248,κ = 0.20)。虽然从临床角度来看,没有一半的常规就诊患者需要进行分流修正,但其中一半患者没有可检测到的分流。在一位接受多次分流测定的患者中,特别证明了间歇性分流。
手术发现表明,该技术对于检测分流非常敏感和特异,但未能检测到分流并不能统计学预测手术的必要性。在评估非侵入性流量测量的真正临床实用性之前,需要更好地了解该设备可能产生的个体患者的正常流量动态。