Rogers W J, Baim D S, Gore J M, Brown B G, Roberts R, Williams D O, Chesebro J H, Babb J D, Sheehan F H, Wackers F J
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction, Coordinating Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Circulation. 1990 May;81(5):1457-76. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.5.1457.
To assess the value and timing of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 586 patients in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Phase II-A were randomized among three treatment strategies, one using immediate coronary arteriography followed by PTCA if appropriate (immediate invasive strategy group, n = 195), a second that deferred angiography and PTCA for 18-48 hours (delayed invasive strategy group, n = 194), and a third, more conservative, approach in which PTCA was used only if ischemia occurred spontaneously or at the time of predischarge exercise testing (conservative strategy group, n = 197). Predischarge contrast left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary study end point, was similar among the patients in all three treatment groups and averaged 49.3%. The finding of a patent infarct-related artery at the time of predischarge arteriography was equally common among the patients in the three groups (mean, 83.7%); however, the mean residual infarct artery stenosis was greater in the patients in the conservative strategy group (67.2%) as compared with the patients in the immediate invasive (50.6%) and the delayed invasive strategy groups (47.8%) (p less than 0.001). Immediate invasive strategy led to a higher rate of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) after PTCA (7.7%) than did delayed invasive and conservative strategies (2.1% and 2.5%, respectively; p less than 0.01). Furthermore, among patients not undergoing CABG during the first 21 days, blood transfusion of more than 1 unit was used in 13.8% of the patients in the immediate invasive strategy group, 3.1% of the patients in the delayed invasive strategy group, and 2.0% of the patients in the conservative strategy group (p less than 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, the three treatment groups had similar cumulative rates of mortality (8.7%, pooled over all groups), fatal and nonfatal reinfarction (8.5%), combined death and reinfarction (14.5%), and CABG (17.2%), although the cumulative performance rate of PTCA remained higher in the invasive groups (immediate invasive strategy group, 75.8%; delayed invasive strategy group, 64.3%; and conservative strategy group, 23.9%; p less than 0.001). Thus, because conservative strategy achieves equally good short- and long-term outcome with less morbidity and a lower use of PTCA, it seems to be the preferred initial management strategy.
为评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)溶栓治疗后经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)的价值及时机,心肌梗死溶栓研究II-A期的586例患者被随机分为三种治疗策略组,一组采用立即冠状动脉造影,若合适则随后行PTCA(立即侵入性策略组,n = 195);第二组将血管造影和PTCA推迟18 - 48小时(延迟侵入性策略组,n = 194);第三组为更保守的方法,仅在自发出现缺血或出院前运动试验时使用PTCA(保守策略组,n = 197)。主要研究终点即出院前对比剂左心室射血分数在所有三个治疗组患者中相似,平均为49.3%。出院前血管造影时梗死相关动脉通畅在三组患者中同样常见(平均为83.7%);然而,保守策略组患者梗死动脉残余狭窄平均(67.2%)高于立即侵入性策略组(50.6%)和延迟侵入性策略组(47.8%)(p < 0.001)。立即侵入性策略导致PTCA后冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)发生率(7.7%)高于延迟侵入性和保守策略组(分别为2.1%和2.5%;p < 0.01)。此外,在前21天未接受CABG的患者中,立即侵入性策略组13.8%的患者输血超过1单位,延迟侵入性策略组为3.1%,保守策略组为2.0%(p < 0.001)。在1年随访时,三个治疗组的累积死亡率(所有组汇总为8.7%)、致命和非致命再梗死率(8.5%)、死亡和再梗死合并率(14.5%)以及CABG率(17.2%)相似,尽管侵入性组PTCA的累积执行率仍然较高(立即侵入性策略组为75.8%;延迟侵入性策略组为64.3%;保守策略组为23.9%;p < 0.001)。因此,由于保守策略能以较低的发病率和较少的PTCA使用实现同样良好的短期和长期结果,它似乎是首选的初始管理策略。