Castro Manuel Carlos Martins de, Silva Celina de Fátima e, Souza João Marcos Rodrigues de, Assis Maria Cristina Silva Brotero de, Aoki Maria Valéria da Silva, Xagoraris Magdaleni, Centeno Jerônimo Ruiz, Souza José Adilson Camargo de
Instituto de Nefrologia de Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Bras Nefrol. 2010 Jul-Sep;32(3):281-5.
Cannulation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) may be performed by the following techniques: area puncture, rope ladder, or buttonhole. The ideal technique has not yet been established.
To assess the complications and difficulties of introducing the buttonhole (BH) technique for cannulation of AVF created with a native vein in a dialysis unit.
Sixteen patients (mean age, 57 ± 14 years) undergoing hemodialysis for 63 ± 38 months were changed to BH AVF cannulation. In the phase of track formation cannulations were performed with sharp needles and, in the maintenance phase, with blunt needles. In both phases, patients were assessed for pain intensity on a 0 to 10 scale.
The number of HD sessions required for the track formation was 9.5 ± 1.5 and the number of sessions during the maintenance phase was 29.7 ± 0.8 per patient. During the 152 HD for the track formation, no significant complications occurred. During the 475 HD sessions using the BH technique and a blunt needle, the complications were as follows: resistance to cannulation (7.6%); cannulation using a sharp needle due to cannulator choice (5.7%); change from a blunt to a sharp needle during cannulation (4.2%); and local bleeding (0.8%). One patient required antibiotic therapy. The median pain intensity reported by the patients was four during the track formation, and two during cannulation with a blunt needle. The Kt/V values before and after changing the cannulation technique did not differ (1.48 ± 0.27 and 1.48 ± 0.23).
The introduction of the BH technique with a blunt needle is technically easy, has few complications, reduces pain, and does not induce change in dialysis dose.
动静脉内瘘(AVF)的插管可通过以下技术进行:区域穿刺、绳梯式穿刺或纽扣式穿刺。目前尚未确定理想的技术。
评估在透析单元中采用纽扣式(BH)技术对自体静脉建立的AVF进行插管的并发症和困难。
16例接受血液透析63±38个月的患者(平均年龄57±14岁)改为采用BH技术进行AVF插管。在隧道形成阶段使用锐针进行插管,在维持阶段使用钝针。在两个阶段,均采用0至10分的疼痛强度评分对患者进行评估。
每位患者形成隧道所需的血液透析次数为9.5±1.5次,维持阶段的次数为29.7±0.8次。在152次用于隧道形成的血液透析过程中,未发生明显并发症。在475次使用BH技术和钝针的血液透析过程中,并发症如下:插管阻力(7.6%);因插管器选择而使用锐针进行插管(5.7%);插管过程中从钝针改为锐针(4.2%);以及局部出血(0.8%)。1例患者需要抗生素治疗。患者报告的疼痛强度中位数在隧道形成阶段为4分,在使用钝针插管时为2分。改变插管技术前后的Kt/V值无差异(分别为1.48±0.27和1.48±0.23)。
采用钝针的BH技术操作简单,并发症少,可减轻疼痛,且不会导致透析剂量改变。