Rodríguez Cruz Yamila, Mengana Támos Yuneidys, Muñoz Cernuda Adriana, Subirós Martines Nelvis, González-Quevedo Alina, Sosa Testé Iliana, García Rodríguez Julio César
Histology Department, Preclinical and Basic Science Institute, Havana, Cuba.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Nov 16;10:2288-300. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.215.
Vascular illness of the brain constitutes the third cause of death and the first cause of disability in Cuba and many other countries. Presently, no medication has been registered as a neuroprotector. Neuroprotection with intranasal Neuro-EPO (EPO, erythropoietin) has emerged as a multifunctional therapy that plays a significant role in neural survival and functional recovery in an animal model of stroke. On the other hand, there is limited access to the brain through the blood brain barrier (BBB) for intravenously applied EPO, and the high EPO dosages needed to obtain a protective effect increase the danger of elevated hematocrit levels and practically exclude chronic or subchronic treatment with EPO. A promising approach has been recently developed with a nonerythropoietic variant of EPO, Neuro-EPO, with low sialic acid content, a very short plasma half-life, and without erythropoietic activity, probably similar to endogenous brain EPO. The objective of this work was to determine the neuroprotective effect of intranasal Neuro-EPO in comparison with the human recombinant EPO injected intraperitoneally in the acute phase of cerebral ischemia, employing the common carotid artery occlusion model in gerbils. Neuro-EPO has demonstrated a better neuroprotective effect, evidenced through increased viability, improvements of the neurological state and cognitive functions, as well as protection of the CA3 region of the hippocampus, temporal cortex, and the thalamus. In conclusion, the intranasal application of Neuro-EPO has a better neuroprotective effect than intraperitoneal EPO, evidenced by the significant improvement of neurological, cognitive, and histological status in the animal model of stroke employed.
在古巴和许多其他国家,脑血管疾病是第三大致死原因和第一大致残原因。目前,尚无药物被登记为神经保护剂。鼻内给予神经促红细胞生成素(Neuro-EPO,促红细胞生成素,EPO)进行神经保护已成为一种多功能疗法,在中风动物模型的神经存活和功能恢复中发挥着重要作用。另一方面,静脉注射的EPO通过血脑屏障(BBB)进入大脑的途径有限,且获得保护作用所需的高剂量EPO增加了血细胞比容水平升高的风险,实际上排除了EPO的慢性或亚慢性治疗。最近开发了一种有前景的方法,即使用促红细胞生成素的非促红细胞生成变体Neuro-EPO,其唾液酸含量低,血浆半衰期非常短,且无促红细胞生成活性,可能类似于内源性脑EPO。这项工作的目的是,在沙鼠大脑缺血急性期,通过颈总动脉闭塞模型,比较鼻内给予Neuro-EPO与腹腔注射人重组EPO的神经保护作用。Neuro-EPO已显示出更好的神经保护作用,表现为活力增加、神经状态和认知功能改善,以及对海马体CA3区、颞叶皮质和丘脑的保护。总之,在所用中风动物模型中,神经、认知和组织学状态的显著改善证明,鼻内给予Neuro-EPO比腹腔注射EPO具有更好的神经保护作用。