Suppr超能文献

特征缺失-存在与两种持续注意力失误理论。

Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2011 Sep;75(5):384-92. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0316-1. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

Abstract

We conducted two experiments using search asymmetry to test two theories of sustained attention lapses currently debated in the literature: the mindlessness theory and the resource theory. In the first experiment, participants performed a feature present and a feature absent sustained attention to response task (SART). The mindlessness theory predicts more commission errors in a feature present SART than a feature absent SART, while resource theory predicts the reverse, i.e. more commission errors in a feature absent SART than feature present SART. The latter occurred. In the second study, participants performed a naturalistic scene vigilance task with targets more analogous to a feature present search or more analogous to a feature absent search. The vigilance decrement occurred, with an increase in reaction time to targets over the course of the vigil. The decrement was more pronounced with the targets more analogous to a feature absent search. Overall, the results of both studies support a resource theory of sustained attention lapses, not the mindlessness theory.

摘要

我们使用搜索不对称进行了两项实验,以测试当前文献中存在争议的两种持续注意力丧失理论:无意识理论和资源理论。在第一个实验中,参与者执行了特征存在和特征不存在的持续注意反应任务(SART)。无意识理论预测在特征存在 SART 中比在特征不存在 SART 中会出现更多的误报错误,而资源理论则预测相反,即在特征不存在 SART 中比在特征存在 SART 中会出现更多的误报错误。事实正是如此。在第二项研究中,参与者执行了自然场景警戒任务,其中目标与特征存在搜索更为相似,或者与特征不存在搜索更为相似。在警戒过程中,随着目标反应时间的增加,警戒效率下降。与特征不存在搜索更为相似的目标的衰减更为明显。总体而言,两项研究的结果均支持持续注意力丧失的资源理论,而不是无意识理论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验