Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2102-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007137.
Studies of weight-control diets that are high in protein or low in glycemic index have reached varied conclusions, probably owing to the fact that the studies had insufficient power.
We enrolled overweight adults from eight European countries who had lost at least 8% of their initial body weight with a 3.3-MJ (800-kcal) low-calorie diet. Participants were randomly assigned, in a two-by-two factorial design, to one of five ad libitum diets to prevent weight regain over a 26-week period: a low-protein and low-glycemic-index diet, a low-protein and high-glycemic-index diet, a high-protein and low-glycemic-index diet, a high-protein and high-glycemic-index diet, or a control diet.
A total of 1209 adults were screened (mean age, 41 years; body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 34), of whom 938 entered the low-calorie-diet phase of the study. A total of 773 participants who completed that phase were randomly assigned to one of the five maintenance diets; 548 completed the intervention (71%). Fewer participants in the high-protein and the low-glycemic-index groups than in the low-protein-high-glycemic-index group dropped out of the study (26.4% and 25.6%, respectively, vs. 37.4%; P=0.02 and P=0.01 for the respective comparisons). The mean initial weight loss with the low-calorie diet was 11.0 kg. In the analysis of participants who completed the study, only the low-protein-high-glycemic-index diet was associated with subsequent significant weight regain (1.67 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 2.87). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the weight regain was 0.93 kg less (95% CI, 0.31 to 1.55) in the groups assigned to a high-protein diet than in those assigned to a low-protein diet (P=0.003) and 0.95 kg less (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.57) in the groups assigned to a low-glycemic-index diet than in those assigned to a high-glycemic-index diet (P=0.003). The analysis involving participants who completed the intervention produced similar results. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to diet-related adverse events.
In this large European study, a modest increase in protein content and a modest reduction in the glycemic index led to an improvement in study completion and maintenance of weight loss. (Funded by the European Commission; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00390637.).
研究发现高蛋白或低血糖指数的减肥饮食各有其优缺点,这可能是因为之前的研究样本量不足。
我们招募了来自 8 个欧洲国家的超重成年人,他们在进行了 3.3 兆焦耳(800 千卡)的低卡路里饮食后,体重至少减轻了 8%。参与者按照 2×2 的析因设计,随机分配到以下 5 种自由进食的饮食方案,以防止在 26 周的时间内体重反弹:低蛋白、低血糖指数饮食;低蛋白、高血糖指数饮食;高蛋白、低血糖指数饮食;高蛋白、高血糖指数饮食;或对照组饮食。
共有 1209 名成年人接受了筛选(平均年龄为 41 岁;体重指数[体重以千克为单位除以身高以米为单位的平方]为 34),其中 938 人进入了低卡路里饮食阶段的研究。共有 773 名完成该阶段的参与者被随机分配到 5 种维持饮食方案中的一种;548 名完成了干预(71%)。与低蛋白-高血糖指数组相比,高蛋白组和低血糖指数组的参与者退出研究的比例较低(分别为 26.4%和 25.6%,而 37.4%;P=0.02 和 P=0.01 用于相应的比较)。低卡路里饮食最初的平均体重减轻量为 11.0 公斤。在完成研究的参与者的分析中,只有高蛋白-高血糖指数饮食与随后显著的体重反弹相关(1.67 公斤;95%置信区间[CI],0.48 至 2.87)。在意向治疗分析中,与低蛋白饮食组相比,高蛋白饮食组的体重反弹少 0.93 公斤(95%CI,0.31 至 1.55)(P=0.003),与高血糖指数饮食组相比,低血糖指数饮食组的体重反弹少 0.95 公斤(95%CI,0.33 至 1.57)(P=0.003)。涉及完成干预的参与者的分析产生了类似的结果。各组在与饮食相关的不良事件方面没有显著差异。
在这项大型欧洲研究中,适度增加蛋白质含量和适度降低血糖指数可提高研究完成率并维持体重减轻。(由欧盟委员会资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00390637。)