Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Khorram Street, Isfahan 81465-1148, Iran.
J Hum Hypertens. 2011 Sep;25(9):545-53. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.99. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
A 10-year longitudinal population-based study, entitled the Isfahan Cohort Study (ICS) is being conducted. The ICS commenced in 2001, recruiting individuals aged 35+ living in urban and rural areas of three counties in central Iran, to determine the individual and combined impact of various risk factors on the incidence of cardiovascular events. After 24379 person-years of follow-up with a median follow-up of 4.8 years, we documented 219 incident cases of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (125 in men and 94 in women) and 57 incident cases of stroke (28 in men and 29 in women). The absolute risk of IHD was 8.9 (7.8-10.2) per 1000 person-years for all participants, 10.6 (8.8-12.5) per 1000 person-years for men and 7.4 (6.0-9.0) per 1000 person-years for women. The respective risk of ischemic stroke was 2.3 (1.7-3.0), 2.3 (1.6-3.3) and 2.3 (1.5-3.2) per 1000 person-years. The risk of IHD was approximately 3.5-fold higher in the presence of hypertension, followed by diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia with near 2.5- and twofold higher risk, respectively. This cohort provides confirmatory evidence of the ethnic differences in the magnitude of the impact of various risk factors on cardiovascular events. The differences may be due to varying absolute risk levels among populations and the existing ethnic disparities for using western risk equations to local requirements.
一项名为伊斯法罕队列研究(ICS)的 10 年纵向基于人群的研究正在进行中。ICS 于 2001 年开始,招募居住在伊朗中部三个县城乡地区的 35 岁及以上人群,以确定各种风险因素对心血管事件发生率的个体和综合影响。在 24379 人年的随访中,中位随访时间为 4.8 年,我们记录了 219 例缺血性心脏病(IHD)事件(男性 125 例,女性 94 例)和 57 例卒中事件(男性 28 例,女性 29 例)。所有参与者的 IHD 绝对风险为 8.9(7.8-10.2)/1000 人年,男性为 10.6(8.8-12.5)/1000 人年,女性为 7.4(6.0-9.0)/1000 人年。缺血性卒中的风险分别为 2.3(1.7-3.0)、2.3(1.6-3.3)和 2.3(1.5-3.2)/1000 人年。存在高血压时,IHD 的风险约为 3.5 倍,其次是糖尿病和高胆固醇血症,风险分别接近 2.5 倍和 2 倍。该队列提供了确认性证据,证明了不同种族之间各种风险因素对心血管事件的影响程度存在差异。这些差异可能是由于不同人群的绝对风险水平不同,以及根据西方风险方程应用于当地需求的现有种族差异。